From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] select ATA_SFF Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:00:12 +0900 Message-ID: <480DFD7C.2030206@gmail.com> References: <20080421213147.GH2633@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <480DE3C4.5@ru.mvista.com> <480DE6F5.8060403@gmail.com> <480DE9E8.2070809@ru.mvista.com> <480DEB1F.5060500@gmail.com> <480DF7B7.9030000@rtr.ca> <480DF876.7070800@gmail.com> <480DF9BD.1080104@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com ([72.14.246.243]:27812 "EHLO ag-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755169AbYDVPAd (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:00:33 -0400 Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 35so3350205aga.10 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:00:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <480DF9BD.1080104@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , Jeff Garzik , Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox Mark Lord wrote: >> Ah.. that means we have the whole naming thing wrong. Yewwww.... > .. > > I suppose. If we were needlessly pedantic, then perhaps > the libata-bmdma.c should be renamed to libata-sff.c, > and the libata-sff.c should be renamed libata-tf.c > > But there's probably been a document or two since then, > where the SFF folks have documented the TF interfaces, too. Fingers and toes and whatever else crossed. > So.. whatever. :) Yeah, that's the spirit. :-) -- tejun