From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] select ATA_SFF Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:54:21 +0400 Message-ID: <480E345D.9090406@ru.mvista.com> References: <20080421213147.GH2633@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <480DE3C4.5@ru.mvista.com> <480DE6F5.8060403@gmail.com> <480DE9E8.2070809@ru.mvista.com> <480DEB1F.5060500@gmail.com> <480DF7B7.9030000@rtr.ca> <480DF876.7070800@gmail.com> <480DF9BD.1080104@rtr.ca> <480DFE76.8000809@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:34179 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1765323AbYDVSy7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:54:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <480DFE76.8000809@ru.mvista.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: Mark Lord , Tejun Heo , Jeff Garzik , Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox Hello, I wrote: >> I suppose. If we were needlessly pedantic, then perhaps >> the libata-bmdma.c should be renamed to libata-sff.c, It *was* renamed to libata-sff.c, back in 2006. :-) >> and the libata-sff.c should be renamed libata-tf.c Not before splitting SFF-8038i stuff from it. >> But there's probably been a document or two since then, >> where the SFF folks have documented the TF interfaces, too. > Don't know, at least I haven't encountered such spec. Unless you mean > SFF-8020i (ATAPI CD-ROM spec). I've looked thru the list of their spec. and it didn't seem to have any about taskfile specifically. SFF-8070 (ATAPI CD-RW) refers to ATA/PI-4 for that matter. MBR, Sergei