linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Paolo <paoletto@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: libata sata_via unusual behaviour
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 22:40:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <481A7F17.6010103@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080501195823.79786815@core>

Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 1 May 2008 20:58:37 +0200
> Paolo <paoletto@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello!
>>
>>  It seems that me and many others are experiencing poor sata performances
>>  in the last months, probably with 2.6.20+ kernels.
>>
>>  an example of these problems is here:
>>
>>  http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=4845777
>>
>>  unfortunately it seems that sata subsystem on linux is little to none
>>  tweakable
> 
> It doesn't normally need tweaking, and the hdparm numbers show that it is
> working correctly in the example you give. There may be problems higher
> up the stack but the ATA layer appears to be doing just fine.
..

Yup.  The drive seems to be doing fine, according to the info you've provided.

But the "-T" (big T) number looks *very* slow:  220.02 MB/sec
That number has nothing to do with the drive.  Rather, it's an indication
of how fast the CPU and memory are together, and that's about 1/20 to 1/10
of a modern system.

Note that it's not a useful number in any absolute sense, but only when
compared with a "-T" value from some other system or Linux distro.

Strange.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-02  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <3bbeafe90805011018o28f46794h369242ccb02b7ced@mail.gmail.com>
2008-05-01 18:58 ` libata sata_via unusual behaviour Paolo
2008-05-01 18:58   ` Alan Cox
2008-05-02  2:40     ` Mark Lord [this message]
     [not found]     ` <3bbeafe90805011216l1780cf5bm9bad77a414062643@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]       ` <20080501211019.21b0701d@core>
2008-05-17 13:56         ` Paolo
2008-05-17 14:45           ` Paolo
2008-05-17 22:04           ` Alan Cox
2008-05-18  7:07             ` Paolo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=481A7F17.6010103@rtr.ca \
    --to=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paoletto@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).