Re: Suspend to memory is freezing my machine

[Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>]

Jacek Luczak wrote:
> Robert Hancock pisze:
>> Jacek Luczak wrote:
>>> Rafael J. Wysocki pisze:
>>>> On Sunday, 4 of May 2008, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>>>>> Hello
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>> With recent 2.6.25 & 2.6.26-rc1 git (around 1 week) I get occasionally
>>>>> complete freeze of my T61 during suspend. (dual core, 2GB).
>>>> How reproducible is this?
>>>>
>>>>> I'm running kernel with no_console_suspend - but all I can see is
>>>>> blinking cursor on an empty screen - thus even when I run kernel with
>>>>> most debug options turned on, I can't pass more details so far.  I run
>>>>> suspend with with SD card in - so maybe some update in the MMC driver
>>>>> might be responsible for this ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Also - I think that option no_console_suspend doens't work correctly -
>>>>> as many times with suspend I do not see any log message on my console
>>>>> screen. However sometimes the log is shown.
>>>> It would be helpful if you could verify if:
>>>>
>>>> (1) The problem occurs without no_console_suspend.
>>>> (2) The problem occurs without the SD card.
>>>>
>>> Hi Rafael,
>>>
>>> same problem here, although I was able to resume system (it's
>>> basically Intel
>>> machine) , but it was unusable - I was able to switch between
>>> terminals and see
>>> output from kernel. So there was:
>>>     - Disabling irq #19;
>>>     - some kind of lock spinning on disk:
>>> IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801GBM/GHM (ICH7 Family) Serial ATA
>>> Storage
>>> Controller IDE (rev 02)
>>>     but I can't provide more output of that lock now - no sign in logs.
>>>
>>> I've made some successful suspend/resume all without sound card active
>>> without
>>> problem. Those appear with sound card active, but I must take closer
>>> look - will
>>> send info later.
>> Can you post your dmesg and /proc/interrupts output from normal bootup ?
> 
> Sure I can ;)
> 
> 1) /proc/interrupts
> 
>            CPU0       CPU1
>   0:   11846981          0   IO-APIC-edge      timer
>   1:      30098          0   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
>   8:          3          0   IO-APIC-edge      rtc
>   9:         13          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
>  12:    1776540          0   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
>  14:         39          0   IO-APIC-edge      ata_piix
>  15:          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      ata_piix
>  16:      54570      44642   IO-APIC-fasteoi   i915@pci:0000:00:02.0
>  17:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb3
>  18:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb4
>  19:      98243          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   ata_piix, uhci_hcd:usb5
>  21:    1650574          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   HDA Intel
>  23:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb2
> 220:      14263          0   PCI-MSI-edge      iwl3945
> 221:    1166041    1333296   PCI-MSI-edge      eth0
> NMI:          0          0   Non-maskable interrupts
> LOC:    1104887    7534969   Local timer interrupts
> RES:     633378     701351   Rescheduling interrupts
> CAL:         16      28315   function call interrupts
> TLB:       1721       2620   TLB shootdowns
> TRM:          0          0   Thermal event interrupts
> SPU:          0          0   Spurious interrupts
> ERR:          0
> MIS:          0
> 
> 2) dmesg can here -> http://212.109.128.251/~difrost/linux-next/dmesg.log
> 3) Kernel:
> Linux difrost 2.6.25-07422-gb66e1f1-dirty #14 SMP Fri May 2 22:04:17 CEST 2008
> i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> It's marked dirty because due to http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/2/405 patch applied.
> 
> -Jacek
> 

Well, if IRQ 19 got disabled, that's your SATA controller, so resume 
likely isn't going to work. Could be a libata problem? CCing linux-ide.

BTW, if your BIOS offers an option to enable AHCI on your SATA 
controller then that would be a more optimal configuration (could get 
NCQ support), but that is an aside.