From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, liml@rtr.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] libata: improve EH retry delay handling
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 13:02:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48324D4E.1040109@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080519193311.01b5b928@core>
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2008 02:17:52 +0900
> Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> EH retries were delayed by 5 seconds to ensure that resets don't occur
>> back-to-back. However, this 5 second delay is superflous or excessive
>> in many cases. For example, after IDENTIFY times out, there's no
>> reason to wait five more seconds before retrying.
>
> You'll crash some ATAPI CD-ROM drives without that delay - at least for
> PATA. As in power cycle required to get it back.
>
> Perhaps we should check cable type here ?
No, no, the five secs is still there.
e.g. Previously:
reset (fail) - 5s retry wait - reset
reset - IDENTIFY (30s timeout) - 5s retry wait - reset
Now:
reset (fail) - 5s retry wait - reset
reset - IDENTIFY (30s timeout) - reset
So, the inter-reset delay is never shorter than 5s.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-20 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-19 17:17 [PATCHSET #upstream] libata: improve timeout handling for EH commands Tejun Heo
2008-05-19 17:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] libata: kill unused constants Tejun Heo
2008-06-04 10:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-05-19 17:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] libata: consistently use msecs for time durations Tejun Heo
2008-05-19 22:35 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-05-20 4:03 ` Tejun Heo
2008-06-13 6:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-05-19 17:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] libata: improve EH retry delay handling Tejun Heo
2008-05-19 18:33 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-20 4:02 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-05-19 17:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] libata: use ULONG_MAX to terminate reset timeout table Tejun Heo
2008-05-19 17:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] libata: improve EH internal command timeout handling Tejun Heo
2008-05-19 18:35 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-19 18:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-05-20 4:05 ` Tejun Heo
2008-05-29 1:59 ` [PATCHSET #upstream] libata: improve timeout handling for EH commands Tejun Heo
2008-06-03 18:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-04 5:02 ` Tejun Heo
2008-11-10 16:32 ` saeed bishara
2008-11-11 2:27 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48324D4E.1040109@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).