From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: fix sleep-while-holding-spinlock in sata_nv
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 20:17:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48338624.3000304@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa.m+kShlzXY/wmFlvZXsE0W7wQIxU@ifi.uio.no>
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] ata: fix sleep-while-holding-spinlock in sata_nv
>
> blk_queue_bounce_limit() is a sleeping function, so reorganize
> the code a little to not call it while holding a spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/ata/sata_nv.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c
> index 858f706..a7bc56d 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c
> @@ -671,6 +671,11 @@ static int nv_adma_slave_config(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> port1 = ap->host->ports[1]->private_data;
> sdev0 = ap->host->ports[0]->link.device[0].sdev;
> sdev1 = ap->host->ports[1]->link.device[0].sdev;
> +
> + blk_queue_segment_boundary(sdev->request_queue, segment_boundary);
> + blk_queue_max_hw_segments(sdev->request_queue, sg_tablesize);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);
> +
> if ((port0->flags & NV_ADMA_ATAPI_SETUP_COMPLETE) ||
> (port1->flags & NV_ADMA_ATAPI_SETUP_COMPLETE)) {
> /** We have to set the DMA mask to 32-bit if either port is in
> @@ -701,14 +706,11 @@ static int nv_adma_slave_config(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> pp->adma_dma_mask);
> }
>
> - blk_queue_segment_boundary(sdev->request_queue, segment_boundary);
> - blk_queue_max_hw_segments(sdev->request_queue, sg_tablesize);
> ata_port_printk(ap, KERN_INFO,
> "DMA mask 0x%llX, segment boundary 0x%lX, hw segs %hu\n",
> (unsigned long long)*ap->host->dev->dma_mask,
> segment_boundary, sg_tablesize);
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);
>
> return rc;
> }
I'm not certain this is safe to do it quite this way. It would be better
to keep that spinlock held so that no operations could be in progress on
either port while these operations are happening.
It would be better to fix the regression from
419c434c35614609fd0c79d335c134bf4b88b30b in block/blk_settings.c that
resulted in the blk_queue_bounce_limit allocation wrongly allocating
emergency ISA pages in the first place as a 32-bit DMA mask does not
need them.
next parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-21 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.m+kShlzXY/wmFlvZXsE0W7wQIxU@ifi.uio.no>
2008-05-21 2:17 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2008-05-21 4:43 ` [PATCH] ata: fix sleep-while-holding-spinlock in sata_nv Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-21 14:31 ` Robert Hancock
2008-05-21 15:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-20 22:58 Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48338624.3000304@shaw.ca \
--to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).