From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: ahci: power off unused ports Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:07:02 -0400 Message-ID: <48441AA6.8080704@garzik.org> References: <20080508161008.59361de5@appleyard> <20080527030854.GC7515@mit.edu> <20080527143202.4bab5bf0@appleyard> <20080527225926.GE6843@mit.edu> <20080527163251.04054a74@appleyard> <20080531080015.GG5405@ucw.cz> <4842F5A8.9020708@garzik.org> <20080602080440.25fc663c@core> <4843A4A7.3020809@garzik.org> <4843EF88.2040606@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:43889 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752223AbYFBQHP (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:07:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4843EF88.2040606@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Alan Cox , Pavel Machek , Kristen Carlson Accardi , Theodore Tso , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mark Lord wrote: > For the power-off of unused ports, the current patch still sounds > extremely vendor-specific (Intel). > > Does it actually work (demonstrate, please) on any other hardware ? Ding... correct. We need something per-port that's not Intel specific. Jeff