From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sata_svw data corruption, strange problems
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:37:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <485EF061.3010601@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080617093602.GA28140@elf.ucw.cz>
Hello,
Pavel Machek wrote:
> I see strange problems on machine with sata_svw. The machine seems to
> corrupt data every few days (ext3 error, dir index corrupted), and has
> some other very strange problems (keyboard misbehaves, pulling out
> SATA disk cures it, see
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=400772 ).
>
> Then I got to the comment
>
> writeb(dmactl | ATA_DMA_START, mmio + ATA_DMA_CMD);
> /* There is a race condition in certain SATA controllers
> that can be seen when the r/w command is given to the controller
> before the host DMA is started. On a Read command, the controller
> would initiate the command to the drive even before it sees the DMA
> start. When there are very fast drives connected to the controller,
> or when the data request hits in the drive cache, there is the
> possibility that the drive returns a part or all of the requested
> data to the controller before the DMA start is issued. In this
> case, the controller would become confused as to what to do with the
> data. In the worst case when all the data is returned back to the
> controller, the controller could hang. In other cases it could
> return partial data returning in data corruption. This problem has
> been seen in PPC systems and can also appear on an system with very
> fast disks, where the SATA controller is sitting behind a number of
> bridges, and hence there is significant latency between the r/w
> command and the start command. */
> /* issue r/w command if the access is to ATA*/
> if (qc->tf.protocol == ATA_PROT_DMA)
>
> ...and that would certainly explain what we are seeing. Are
> serverworks controllers broken by design?
The comment looks like a warning to me as the DMA engine is started
before the command is issued to the drive as explained in the next
comment.
--
tejun
next parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-23 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080617093602.GA28140@elf.ucw.cz>
2008-06-23 0:37 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-06-23 8:20 ` sata_svw data corruption, strange problems Pavel Machek
2008-06-23 8:22 ` Tejun Heo
2008-06-23 8:39 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-06-23 8:53 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-23 8:56 ` Tejun Heo
2008-06-23 9:01 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-23 9:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-23 9:26 ` Pavel Machek
2008-06-23 9:48 ` Tejun Heo
2008-06-23 9:42 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-23 10:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-23 13:05 ` Tejun Heo
2008-06-27 6:41 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=485EF061.3010601@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).