From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: FW: ICH10R PMP support Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:15:44 -0400 Message-ID: <48609F20.4060608@pobox.com> References: <023701c8d4dd$d737fa10$85a7ee30$@com> <485F6830.1040000@pobox.com> <485F7356.5050605@kernel.org> <48609C8F.90805@pobox.com> <48609E01.1050802@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:48459 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751898AbYFXHQJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:16:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48609E01.1050802@kernel.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Milo Medin , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Grant Grundler Tejun Heo wrote: > Mark Lord wrote: >> Tejun Heo wrote: >>> Mark Lord wrote: >> .. >>>> The 7042 is the best of the Marvell chips, for Linux. >>> How high does it go bandwidth-wise? >> .. >> >> The limiting factor will be the bus width of the card >> and the slot into which it is plugged, I suspect. .. Note that this has yet to be confirmed in practice, though I don't know if anyone has really tried hard yet. Perhaps Grant Grundler ? .. > Cool. I was asking because sil3124 and 32 seem to have inherent > bandwidth limit regardless of the bus it lives on. I'm planning on > checking out 3132-2 chips to see whether they improved on that front. .. Cheers -- Mark Lord Real-Time Remedies Inc. mlord@pobox.com