linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: + pata_viac-add-flag-for-vx800-and-add-a-function-for-fixing-internal-bugs-for-via-chipsets.patch added to -mm tree
  2008-07-28 13:02 ` + pata_viac-add-flag-for-vx800-and-add-a-function-for-fixing-internal-bugs-for-via-chipsets.patch added to -mm tree Tejun Heo
@ 2008-07-28 12:48   ` Alan Cox
  2008-07-28 13:14     ` Tejun Heo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2008-07-28 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: akpm, mm-commits, JosephChan, jeff, IDE/ATA development list

> And, likewise, I think
> 
> 	if (tf->ctl != tf->last_ctl)
> 		tf->flags |= ATA_TFLAG_DEVICE;
> 	ata_sff_tf_load(ap, tf);
> 
> would be better.

Are we actually guranteed that tf->device is valid in every case where
ATA_TFLAG_DEVICE is not set ? I don't think we actually are, in which
case we should cache the last tf->device in the ap->private_data
structures

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: + pata_viac-add-flag-for-vx800-and-add-a-function-for-fixing-internal-bugs-for-via-chipsets.patch added to -mm tree
       [not found] <200807220814.m6M8EYoC017989@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
@ 2008-07-28 13:02 ` Tejun Heo
  2008-07-28 12:48   ` Alan Cox
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2008-07-28 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm; +Cc: mm-commits, JosephChan, alan, jeff, IDE/ATA development list

Hello, again.

akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> @@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ static const struct via_isa_bridge {
>  	u8 rev_max;
>  	u16 flags;
>  } via_isa_bridges[] = {
> -	{ "vx800",	PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_VX800,    0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
> +	{ "vx800",	PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_VX800,    0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 |
> +	VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_SATA_PATA },
>  	{ "vt8237s",	PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237S,    0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
>  	{ "vt8251",	PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8251,     0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST },
>  	{ "cx700",	PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_CX700,    0x00, 0x2f, VIA_UDMA_133 | VIA_BAD_AST | VIA_SATA_PATA },
> @@ -322,6 +323,65 @@ static void via_set_dmamode(struct ata_p
>  	via_do_set_mode(ap, adev, adev->dma_mode, tclock[mode], set_ast, udma[mode]);
>  }

Please put this into a separate patch.

> +/**
> + *	via_ata_sff_tf_load - send taskfile registers to host controller
> + *	@ap: Port to which output is sent
> + *	@tf: ATA taskfile register set
> + *
> + *	Outputs ATA taskfile to standard ATA host controller.
> + *
> + *	Note: This is to fix the internal bug of via chipsets, which
> + *  will reset the device register after changing the IEN bit on
> + *  ctl register
> + */
> +static void via_ata_tf_load(struct ata_port *ap, const struct ata_taskfile *tf)
> +{
> +	struct ata_ioports *ioaddr = &ap->ioaddr;
> +	unsigned int is_addr = tf->flags & ATA_TFLAG_ISADDR;
> +
> +	if (tf->ctl != ap->last_ctl) {
> +		iowrite8(tf->ctl, ioaddr->ctl_addr);
> +		iowrite8(tf->device, ioaddr->device_addr);
> +		ap->last_ctl = tf->ctl;
> +		ata_wait_idle(ap);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (is_addr && (tf->flags & ATA_TFLAG_LBA48)) {
> +		iowrite8(tf->hob_feature, ioaddr->feature_addr);
> +		iowrite8(tf->hob_nsect, ioaddr->nsect_addr);
> +		iowrite8(tf->hob_lbal, ioaddr->lbal_addr);
> +		iowrite8(tf->hob_lbam, ioaddr->lbam_addr);
> +		iowrite8(tf->hob_lbah, ioaddr->lbah_addr);
> +		VPRINTK("hob: feat 0x%X nsect 0x%X, lba 0x%X 0x%X 0x%X\n",
> +			tf->hob_feature,
> +			tf->hob_nsect,
> +			tf->hob_lbal,
> +			tf->hob_lbam,
> +			tf->hob_lbah);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (is_addr) {
> +		iowrite8(tf->feature, ioaddr->feature_addr);
> +		iowrite8(tf->nsect, ioaddr->nsect_addr);
> +		iowrite8(tf->lbal, ioaddr->lbal_addr);
> +		iowrite8(tf->lbam, ioaddr->lbam_addr);
> +		iowrite8(tf->lbah, ioaddr->lbah_addr);
> +		VPRINTK("feat 0x%X nsect 0x%X lba 0x%X 0x%X 0x%X\n",
> +			tf->feature,
> +			tf->nsect,
> +			tf->lbal,
> +			tf->lbam,
> +			tf->lbah);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (tf->flags & ATA_TFLAG_DEVICE) {
> +		iowrite8(tf->device, ioaddr->device_addr);
> +		VPRINTK("device 0x%X\n", tf->device);
> +	}
> +
> +	ata_wait_idle(ap);
> +}

And, likewise, I think

	if (tf->ctl != tf->last_ctl)
		tf->flags |= ATA_TFLAG_DEVICE;
	ata_sff_tf_load(ap, tf);

would be better.

-- 
tejun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: + pata_viac-add-flag-for-vx800-and-add-a-function-for-fixing-internal-bugs-for-via-chipsets.patch added to -mm tree
  2008-07-28 12:48   ` Alan Cox
@ 2008-07-28 13:14     ` Tejun Heo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2008-07-28 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Cox; +Cc: akpm, mm-commits, JosephChan, jeff, IDE/ATA development list

Alan Cox wrote:
>> And, likewise, I think
>>
>> 	if (tf->ctl != tf->last_ctl)
>> 		tf->flags |= ATA_TFLAG_DEVICE;
>> 	ata_sff_tf_load(ap, tf);
>>
>> would be better.
> 
> Are we actually guranteed that tf->device is valid in every case where
> ATA_TFLAG_DEVICE is not set ? I don't think we actually are, in which
> case we should cache the last tf->device in the ap->private_data
> structures

Yeap, tf->device is setup during ata_tf_init().

-- 
tejun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-28 13:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <200807220814.m6M8EYoC017989@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-28 13:02 ` + pata_viac-add-flag-for-vx800-and-add-a-function-for-fixing-internal-bugs-for-via-chipsets.patch added to -mm tree Tejun Heo
2008-07-28 12:48   ` Alan Cox
2008-07-28 13:14     ` Tejun Heo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).