From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] libata: Implement disk shock protection support Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:58:23 +0900 Message-ID: <4895B97F.4020708@gmail.com> References: <87prp1kvyy.fsf@denkblock.local> <20080726062142.29070.10413.stgit@denkblock.local> <4892B8FE.1070400@gmail.com> <20080801233459.11e9b254@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <489523DC.2090903@gmail.com> <20080803140536.062c2ef1@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.230]:44347 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755237AbYHCN67 (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Aug 2008 09:58:59 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so1744207rvb.1 for ; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 06:58:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080803140536.062c2ef1@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Elias Oltmanns , Jeff Garzik , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , James Bottomley , Pavel Machek , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: >> on both sides of the cable and I think things like that would be more >> difficult to work accidentally. > > We'd have to query the drive vendors to see what they expected. We'll have to query the controller vendors too and I think it's highly likely to cause problems on many controllers. -- tejun