From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes] sata_mv: don't issue two DMA commands concurrently Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:11:24 -0400 Message-ID: <48AE588C.6080605@garzik.org> References: <489C19CE.6030708@ngs.ru> <489C4B6E.9070306@rtr.ca> <489C4F29.6020007@rtr.ca> <489C54D1.5080901@rtr.ca> <48A29E14.3090908@gmail.com> <48A2BBDC.2090201@ngs.ru> <48A2BC5D.5060801@gmail.com> <48A2C35C.7020400@ngs.ru> <48A2C460.6040504@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:50852 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752888AbYHVGL3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:11:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48A2C460.6040504@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Artem Bokhan , Mark Lord , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo wrote: > sata_mv allowed issuing two DMA commands concurrently which the > hardware allows. Unfortunately, libata core layer isn't ready for > this yet and spews ugly warning message and malfunctions on this. > Don't allow concurrent DMA commands for now. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo applied