From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes] sata_mv: don't issue two DMA commands concurrently Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:54:24 -0400 Message-ID: <48B40B10.6060301@rtr.ca> References: <489C19CE.6030708@ngs.ru> <489C4B6E.9070306@rtr.ca> <489C4F29.6020007@rtr.ca> <489C54D1.5080901@rtr.ca> <48A29E14.3090908@gmail.com> <48A2BBDC.2090201@ngs.ru> <48A2BC5D.5060801@gmail.com> <48A2C35C.7020400@ngs.ru> <48A2C460.6040504@gmail.com> <48AE588C.6080605@garzik.org> <20080822170119.GA18700@deprecation.cyrius.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rtr.ca ([76.10.145.34]:38805 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754603AbYHZNyZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:54:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080822170119.GA18700@deprecation.cyrius.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Martin Michlmayr Cc: Tejun Heo , Artem Bokhan , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Jeff Garzik [2008-08-22 02:11]: >> Tejun Heo wrote: >>> sata_mv allowed issuing two DMA commands concurrently which the >>> hardware allows. Unfortunately, libata core layer isn't ready for >>> this yet and spews ugly warning message and malfunctions on this. >>> Don't allow concurrent DMA commands for now. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo >> applied > > Is this -stable material? Absolutely yes.