From: John Clark <clarkjc@runbox.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Interoperability problem with Quantum CD72SH SATA tape drive and libata
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:13:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E40415.7050607@runbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48E2ECA8.8060808@kernel.org>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> John Clark wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've discovered an issue with the Quantum CD72SH SATA tape drive. I set
>> it to variable block size, try to write a 5317 byte block with an ATAPI
>> issued WRITE(6), and it hangs. The drive is connected to an Intel ICH9R
>> in AHCI mode.
>>
>> My debugging efforts have determined that it's a problem with the
>> drive's firmware. It does not like ATAPI CDBs with odd (& 1) transfer
>> lengths with PIO. If I let it use DMA, even if it's not a multiple of
>> 16 bytes, then it seems to work:
>>
>> --- libata-core.c.orig 2008-09-27 16:12:46.000000000 -0400
>> +++ libata-core.c 2008-09-27 16:11:29.000000000 -0400
>> @@ -4669,8 +4669,8 @@
>> /* Don't allow DMA if it isn't multiple of 16 bytes. Quite a
>> * few ATAPI devices choke on such DMA requests.
>> */
>> - if (unlikely(qc->nbytes & 15))
>> - return 1;
>> + // if (unlikely(qc->nbytes & 15))
>> + // return 1;
>>
>> if (ap->ops->check_atapi_dma)
>> return ap->ops->check_atapi_dma(qc);
>>
>>
>>
>> This is an acceptable solution for my limited use, but I'd like to see
>> it work out of the box. It seems frightening that there are ATAPI
>> devices out there that choke on PIO requests. What would you like to do?
>>
>
> We can create a HORKAGE for it. Can you please post the result of
> "hdparm -I" of the device?
>
>
Tejun,
Here it is:
/dev/nst0:
ATAPI Sequential-access device, with removable media
Model Number: QUANTUM DAT DAT72-000
Serial Number: JR001H1
Firmware Revision: VC090000
Standards:
Used: ATA/ATAPI-7 T13 1532D revision 4a
Supported: 7 6 5 4
Configuration:
DRQ response: 50us.
Packet size: 12 bytes
Capabilities:
LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 *udma6
Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns
PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
Cycle time: no flow control=120ns IORDY flow control=120ns
Commands/features:
Enabled Supported:
* Power Management feature set
* PACKET command feature set
* DEVICE_RESET command
* NOP cmd
* SATA-I signaling speed (1.5Gb/s)
Integrity word not set (found 0x0000, expected 0x6da5)
Thank you.
- John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-01 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-27 20:25 Interoperability problem with Quantum CD72SH SATA tape drive and libata John Clark
2008-10-01 3:21 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-01 23:13 ` John Clark [this message]
2008-10-04 20:45 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-06 19:36 ` John Clark
2008-10-07 1:29 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48E40415.7050607@runbox.com \
--to=clarkjc@runbox.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).