linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Rob Whitton <rwhitton@bluearc.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "SCR access via SIDPR is available but doesn't work"
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:28:14 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48F2F88E.5070504@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D76E016F4A2A749A1EB1A3FD83E22BC01E0D94C@uk-email.terastack.bluearc.com>

Hello,

Rob Whitton wrote:
> We experience the same problem with two different motherboards (the only
> motherboards we have tried in this system):
> 
>   TYAN S5211
>   Intel S3210SHLC
> 
> The original boot logs were from the Tyan motherboard which is what we
> have been working with almost exclusively. However, in the lab we
> currently have the Intel board in use and as such I've recreated the
> failing and succeeding boot logs on the Intel board so that the boots
> logs are consistent with the output of "lspci -nn" which is also
> attached.
> 
> With regard to changing piix_port_info structures this will have to wait
> for the moment. Our kernel building expert is currently on vacation. But
> maybe this step will be unnecessary - see below.

I think that will be an easy way to rule out whether the SIDPR is the
offending piece or not.

> I note that in the Intel boot logs whilst booting stops at the same
> point it doesn't display the message which started this thread and
> tended to point the finger of suspicion at the PIIX driver (probably
> should change the subject line of the email). Maybe it is a more
> fundamental kernel problem? I'm still very surprised that simply moving
> the SATA disk between ports causes this problem. Maybe it relates to
> interrupt routing or similar. I assume that the two SATA controllers in
> the Intel chipset use different interrupts.

Yes, they use different IRQs but IRQ lock ups are usually a bit more
verbose.  The last two ports on ICH9 seem to have rather obscure
problems (PMP detection failure for one) and this might be one of
those.  Anyways, please confirm whether SIDPR is the offending piece
or not.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

      reply	other threads:[~2008-10-13  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <3D76E016F4A2A749A1EB1A3FD83E22BC01D6E466@uk-email.terastack.bluearc.com>
     [not found] ` <48E6D8F4.2080207@gmail.com>
2008-10-08 10:37   ` "SCR access via SIDPR is available but doesn't work" Rob Whitton
2008-10-08 21:48     ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-08 21:50       ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-09 11:14         ` Rob Whitton
2008-10-13  7:28           ` Tejun Heo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48F2F88E.5070504@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rwhitton@bluearc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).