From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: Can you please test the attached patch for nv hardreset problem? Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:18:32 +0900 Message-ID: <48F3F368.2090901@kernel.org> References: <48E80F11.3060101@kernel.org> <64630f150810111634gbe4cfdfjccafc9f6f781edcc@mail.gmail.com> <48F30678.7020807@kernel.org> <64630f150810131213m64d8fc72j38debf71a692db16@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:60491 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756092AbYJNBUY (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:20:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <64630f150810131213m64d8fc72j38debf71a692db16@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: gettinther Cc: IDE/ATA development list , lists@ku-gbr.de, linux@sun7.cn, Robert Hancock gettinther wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: >> gettinther wrote: >>> OK, patching the 2.6.26 based on your patch doesn't work properly. It >>> works for sata devices but not sata emulated devices (but these do >>> work with the 2.6.27). >> Eh... what do you mean it doesn't work on 2.6.26? The same change >> doesn't work on 2.6.26 but it does on 2.6.27? How did you apply the >> change to 2.6.26? Can you post the diff? >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> tejun >> > > Sorry, replied on the wrong thread > > Here's the patch I applied Hmm... that should work for 2.6.26 for MCP55. Can you post the failing log? -- tejun