From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: Stack dump from GIT HEAD if CONFIG_ATA_SFF is not set Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:45:20 +0900 Message-ID: <48F6B8D0.7090307@kernel.org> References: <48F3D8EA.4080708@lwfinger.net> <20081015014128.1bde68cb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:35475 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751924AbYJPDrV (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:47:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20081015014128.1bde68cb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Larry Finger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > (cc linux-ide) > >> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:25:30 -0700 Larry Finger wrote: >> I am using kernel 2.6.27-Linus-03151-g4480f15b-dirty. On booting a system built >> with CONFIG_ATA_SFF not set, the following appears in my dmesg output. The >> "dirtiness" of the kernel is due to some code included to trace down messages >> coming from the usb system, and is not involved here. If CONFIG_ATA_SFF=y, the >> message does not appear. From Google results, it seems that this parameter >> should be set for most systems, but one should get clean runs without it. Yeap, working on it. It seems SFF/BMDMA support needs to be separated out further. Thanks for the report. -- tejun