* [PATCH] ide: Add tx4938ide driver
@ 2008-10-17 14:11 Atsushi Nemoto
2008-10-19 16:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Atsushi Nemoto @ 2008-10-17 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips; +Cc: linux-ide, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, ralf, sshtylyov
This is the driver for the Toshiba TX4938 SoC EBUS controller ATA mode.
It has custom set_pio_mode and some hacks for big endian.
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
---
drivers/ide/Kconfig | 5 +
drivers/ide/mips/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/ide/mips/tx4938ide.c | 319 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 325 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/ide/mips/tx4938ide.c
diff --git a/drivers/ide/Kconfig b/drivers/ide/Kconfig
index c23ff28..3af5e42 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/ide/Kconfig
@@ -746,6 +746,11 @@ config BLK_DEV_IDE_AU1XXX_SEQTS_PER_RQ
default "128"
depends on BLK_DEV_IDE_AU1XXX
+config BLK_DEV_IDE_TX4938
+ tristate "TX4938 internal IDE support"
+ depends on SOC_TX4938
+ select IDE_TIMINGS
+
config BLK_DEV_IDE_TX4939
tristate "TX4939 internal IDE support"
depends on SOC_TX4939
diff --git a/drivers/ide/mips/Makefile b/drivers/ide/mips/Makefile
index 04e5d86..7b217e6 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/mips/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/ide/mips/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_AU1XXX) += au1xxx-ide.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_TX4938) += tx4938ide.o
obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_TX4939) += tx4939ide.o
EXTRA_CFLAGS := -Idrivers/ide
diff --git a/drivers/ide/mips/tx4938ide.c b/drivers/ide/mips/tx4938ide.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2e5778d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/ide/mips/tx4938ide.c
@@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
+/*
+ * TX4938 internal IDE driver
+ * Based on tx4939ide.c.
+ *
+ * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
+ * License. See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive
+ * for more details.
+ *
+ * (C) Copyright TOSHIBA CORPORATION 2005-2007
+ */
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/ide.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <asm/txx9/tx4938.h>
+
+static void tx4938ide_tune_ebusc(unsigned int ebus_ch,
+ unsigned int gbus_clock,
+ u8 pio)
+{
+ struct ide_timing *t = ide_timing_find_mode(XFER_PIO_0 + pio);
+ u64 cr = __raw_readq(&tx4938_ebuscptr->cr[ebus_ch]);
+ unsigned int sp = ((unsigned int)cr >> 4) & 3;
+ unsigned int clock = gbus_clock / (4 - sp);
+ unsigned int cycle = 1000000000 / clock;
+ unsigned int wt, shwt;
+
+ /* IORDY setup time: 35ns */
+ wt = (35 + cycle - 1) / cycle;
+ /* actual wait-cycle is max(wt & ~1, 1) */
+ if (wt > 2 && (wt & 1))
+ wt++;
+ wt &= ~1;
+ /* Address valid to DIOR/DIOW setup */
+ shwt = (t->setup + cycle - 1) / cycle;
+
+ pr_debug("tx4938ide: ebus %d, bus cycle %dns, WT %d, SHWT %d\n",
+ ebus_ch, cycle, wt, shwt);
+
+ __raw_writeq((cr & ~(0x3f007ull)) | (wt << 12) | shwt,
+ &tx4938_ebuscptr->cr[ebus_ch]);
+}
+
+static void tx4938ide_set_pio_mode(ide_drive_t *drive, const u8 pio)
+{
+ ide_hwif_t *hwif = drive->hwif;
+ struct tx4938ide_platform_info *pdata = hwif->dev->platform_data;
+ u8 safe = pio;
+ ide_drive_t *pair;
+
+ if (!pdata->gbus_clock)
+ return;
+ pair = ide_get_pair_dev(drive);
+ if (pair)
+ safe = min(safe, ide_get_best_pio_mode(pair, 255, 5));
+ tx4938ide_tune_ebusc(pdata->ebus_ch, pdata->gbus_clock, safe);
+}
+
+#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
+
+/* custom iops (independent from SWAP_IO_SPACE) */
+static u8 tx4938ide_inb(unsigned long port)
+{
+ return (u8)__raw_readb((void __iomem *)port);
+}
+
+static void tx4938ide_outb(u8 value, unsigned long port)
+{
+ __raw_writeb(value, (void __iomem *)port);
+}
+
+static void tx4938ide_tf_load(ide_drive_t *drive, ide_task_t *task)
+{
+ ide_hwif_t *hwif = drive->hwif;
+ struct ide_io_ports *io_ports = &hwif->io_ports;
+ struct ide_taskfile *tf = &task->tf;
+ u8 HIHI = (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_LBA48) ? 0xE0 : 0xEF;
+
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_FLAGGED)
+ HIHI = 0xFF;
+
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_OUT_DATA) {
+ u16 data = (tf->hob_data << 8) | tf->data;
+
+ /* no endian swap */
+ __raw_writew(data, (void __iomem *)io_ports->data_addr);
+ }
+
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_OUT_HOB_FEATURE)
+ tx4938ide_outb(tf->hob_feature, io_ports->feature_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_OUT_HOB_NSECT)
+ tx4938ide_outb(tf->hob_nsect, io_ports->nsect_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_OUT_HOB_LBAL)
+ tx4938ide_outb(tf->hob_lbal, io_ports->lbal_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_OUT_HOB_LBAM)
+ tx4938ide_outb(tf->hob_lbam, io_ports->lbam_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_OUT_HOB_LBAH)
+ tx4938ide_outb(tf->hob_lbah, io_ports->lbah_addr);
+
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_OUT_FEATURE)
+ tx4938ide_outb(tf->feature, io_ports->feature_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_OUT_NSECT)
+ tx4938ide_outb(tf->nsect, io_ports->nsect_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_OUT_LBAL)
+ tx4938ide_outb(tf->lbal, io_ports->lbal_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_OUT_LBAM)
+ tx4938ide_outb(tf->lbam, io_ports->lbam_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_OUT_LBAH)
+ tx4938ide_outb(tf->lbah, io_ports->lbah_addr);
+
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_OUT_DEVICE)
+ tx4938ide_outb((tf->device & HIHI) | drive->select,
+ io_ports->device_addr);
+}
+
+static void tx4938ide_tf_read(ide_drive_t *drive, ide_task_t *task)
+{
+ ide_hwif_t *hwif = drive->hwif;
+ struct ide_io_ports *io_ports = &hwif->io_ports;
+ struct ide_taskfile *tf = &task->tf;
+
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_IN_DATA) {
+ u16 data;
+
+ /* no endian swap */
+ data = __raw_readw((void __iomem *)io_ports->data_addr);
+ tf->data = data & 0xff;
+ tf->hob_data = (data >> 8) & 0xff;
+ }
+
+ /* be sure we're looking at the low order bits */
+ tx4938ide_outb(ATA_DEVCTL_OBS & ~0x80, io_ports->ctl_addr);
+
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_IN_FEATURE)
+ tf->feature = tx4938ide_inb(io_ports->feature_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_IN_NSECT)
+ tf->nsect = tx4938ide_inb(io_ports->nsect_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_IN_LBAL)
+ tf->lbal = tx4938ide_inb(io_ports->lbal_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_IN_LBAM)
+ tf->lbam = tx4938ide_inb(io_ports->lbam_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_IN_LBAH)
+ tf->lbah = tx4938ide_inb(io_ports->lbah_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_IN_DEVICE)
+ tf->device = tx4938ide_inb(io_ports->device_addr);
+
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_LBA48) {
+ tx4938ide_outb(ATA_DEVCTL_OBS | 0x80, io_ports->ctl_addr);
+
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_IN_HOB_FEATURE)
+ tf->hob_feature =
+ tx4938ide_inb(io_ports->feature_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_IN_HOB_NSECT)
+ tf->hob_nsect = tx4938ide_inb(io_ports->nsect_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_IN_HOB_LBAL)
+ tf->hob_lbal = tx4938ide_inb(io_ports->lbal_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_IN_HOB_LBAM)
+ tf->hob_lbam = tx4938ide_inb(io_ports->lbam_addr);
+ if (task->tf_flags & IDE_TFLAG_IN_HOB_LBAH)
+ tf->hob_lbah = tx4938ide_inb(io_ports->lbah_addr);
+ }
+}
+
+static void tx4938ide_input_data_swap(ide_drive_t *drive, struct request *rq,
+ void *buf, unsigned int len)
+{
+ unsigned long port = drive->hwif->io_ports.data_addr;
+ unsigned short *ptr = buf;
+ unsigned int count = (len + 1) / 2;
+
+ while (count--)
+ *ptr++ = cpu_to_le16(__raw_readw((void __iomem *)port));
+ __ide_flush_dcache_range((unsigned long)buf, count * 2);
+}
+
+static void tx4938ide_output_data_swap(ide_drive_t *drive, struct request *rq,
+ void *buf, unsigned int len)
+{
+ unsigned long port = drive->hwif->io_ports.data_addr;
+ unsigned short *ptr = buf;
+ unsigned int count = (len + 1) / 2;
+
+ while (count--) {
+ __raw_writew(le16_to_cpu(*ptr), (void __iomem *)port);
+ ptr++;
+ }
+ __ide_flush_dcache_range((unsigned long)buf, count * 2);
+}
+
+static const struct ide_tp_ops tx4938ide_tp_ops = {
+ .exec_command = ide_exec_command,
+ .read_status = ide_read_status,
+ .read_altstatus = ide_read_altstatus,
+ .read_sff_dma_status = ide_read_sff_dma_status,
+
+ .set_irq = ide_set_irq,
+
+ .tf_load = tx4938ide_tf_load,
+ .tf_read = tx4938ide_tf_read,
+
+ .input_data = tx4938ide_input_data_swap,
+ .output_data = tx4938ide_output_data_swap,
+};
+
+#endif /* __BIG_ENDIAN */
+
+static const struct ide_port_ops tx4938ide_port_ops = {
+ .set_pio_mode = tx4938ide_set_pio_mode,
+};
+
+static const struct ide_port_info tx4938ide_port_info __initdata = {
+ .port_ops = &tx4938ide_port_ops,
+#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
+ .tp_ops = &tx4938ide_tp_ops,
+#endif
+ .host_flags = IDE_HFLAG_MMIO | IDE_HFLAG_NO_DMA, /* no SFF-style DMA */
+ .pio_mask = ATA_PIO5,
+};
+
+static int __init tx4938ide_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ hw_regs_t hw;
+ hw_regs_t *hws[] = { &hw, NULL, NULL, NULL };
+ struct ide_host *host;
+ unsigned long port[2], port_size[2];
+ void __iomem *mmport[2];
+ struct tx4938ide_platform_info *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
+ unsigned int ebus_ch;
+ int irq;
+ int ret;
+ int i;
+
+ irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (irq < 0)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ ebus_ch = pdata->ebus_ch;
+ port[0] = ((__raw_readq(&tx4938_ebuscptr->cr[ebus_ch]) >> 48) << 20)
+ + 0x10000;
+ port[1] = port[0] + 0x10000;
+ port_size[0] = 8;
+ port_size[1] = 1;
+ port[1] += (6 << pdata->ioport_shift);
+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
+ port_size[i] <<= pdata->ioport_shift;
+ for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+ if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev,
+ port[i], port_size[i],
+ "tx4938ide"))
+ return -EBUSY;
+ mmport[i] = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, port[i], port_size[i]);
+ if (!mmport[i])
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ memset(&hw, 0, sizeof(hw));
+ if (pdata->ioport_shift) {
+ hw.io_ports_array[0] = (unsigned long)mmport[0];
+#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
+ mmport[0]++;
+ mmport[1]++;
+#endif
+ for (i = 1; i <= 7; i++)
+ hw.io_ports_array[i] = (unsigned long)mmport[0] +
+ (i << pdata->ioport_shift);
+ hw.io_ports.ctl_addr = (unsigned long)mmport[1];
+ } else
+ ide_std_init_ports(&hw, (unsigned long)mmport[0],
+ (unsigned long)mmport[1]);
+ hw.irq = irq;
+ hw.dev = &pdev->dev;
+
+ pr_info("TX4938 IDE interface (base %#lx, ctl %#lx, irq %d)\n",
+ port[0], port[1], hw.irq);
+ if (pdata->gbus_clock)
+ tx4938ide_tune_ebusc(ebus_ch, pdata->gbus_clock, 0);
+
+ ret = ide_host_add(&tx4938ide_port_info, hws, &host);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, host);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __exit tx4938ide_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct ide_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ ide_host_remove(host);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver tx4938ide_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "tx4938ide",
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ },
+ .remove = __exit_p(tx4938ide_remove),
+};
+
+static int __init tx4938ide_init(void)
+{
+ return platform_driver_probe(&tx4938ide_driver, tx4938ide_probe);
+}
+
+static void __exit tx4938ide_exit(void)
+{
+ platform_driver_unregister(&tx4938ide_driver);
+}
+
+module_init(tx4938ide_init);
+module_exit(tx4938ide_exit);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TX4938 internal IDE driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_ALIAS("platform:tx4938ide");
--
1.5.6.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ide: Add tx4938ide driver
2008-10-17 14:11 [PATCH] ide: Add tx4938ide driver Atsushi Nemoto
@ 2008-10-19 16:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-10-20 14:15 ` Atsushi Nemoto
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2008-10-19 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Atsushi Nemoto; +Cc: linux-mips, linux-ide, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, ralf
Hello.
Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> This is the driver for the Toshiba TX4938 SoC EBUS controller ATA mode.
> It has custom set_pio_mode and some hacks for big endian.
> Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/ide/mips/tx4938ide.c b/drivers/ide/mips/tx4938ide.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2e5778d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/ide/mips/tx4938ide.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
[...]
> +static void tx4938ide_tune_ebusc(unsigned int ebus_ch,
> + unsigned int gbus_clock,
> + u8 pio)
> +{
> + struct ide_timing *t = ide_timing_find_mode(XFER_PIO_0 + pio);
> + u64 cr = __raw_readq(&tx4938_ebuscptr->cr[ebus_ch]);
> + unsigned int sp = ((unsigned int)cr >> 4) & 3;
> + unsigned int clock = gbus_clock / (4 - sp);
> + unsigned int cycle = 1000000000 / clock;
> + unsigned int wt, shwt;
> +
> + /* IORDY setup time: 35ns */
> + wt = (35 + cycle - 1) / cycle;
It's not that simple I'm afraid: you can't just wait IORDY for 35 ns as
that won't guarantee the minimum DIOx- actime time for the current PIO mode;
so t->act8 (since it's >= t->act) should be part of the equation here,
possibly with subtraction of couple cycles, if I'm interpreting the timing
diagrams in the datasheet correctly...
And please use DIV_ROUND_UP() -- like the other drivers do.
> + /* actual wait-cycle is max(wt & ~1, 1) */
I got an impression that WT[0] bit is used otherwise in the ready mode,
and PWT[1:0]:WT[3:1] = 00000 would mean 0 cycles, not 1...
> + if (wt > 2 && (wt & 1))
> + wt++;
> + wt &= ~1;
> + /* Address valid to DIOR/DIOW setup */
> + shwt = (t->setup + cycle - 1) / cycle;
Use DIV_ROUND_UP() here too.
> +
> + pr_debug("tx4938ide: ebus %d, bus cycle %dns, WT %d, SHWT %d\n",
> + ebus_ch, cycle, wt, shwt);
> +
> + __raw_writeq((cr & ~(0x3f007ull)) | (wt << 12) | shwt,
> + &tx4938_ebuscptr->cr[ebus_ch]);
> +}
[...]
> +static const struct ide_port_info tx4938ide_port_info __initdata = {
> + .port_ops = &tx4938ide_port_ops,
> +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> + .tp_ops = &tx4938ide_tp_ops,
> +#endif
> + .host_flags = IDE_HFLAG_MMIO | IDE_HFLAG_NO_DMA, /* no SFF-style DMA */
DMA is not required to be SFF-style. It's just that TX4938 doesn't support
any kind of IDE DMA, IIUC...
> + .pio_mask = ATA_PIO5,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init tx4938ide_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + hw_regs_t hw;
> + hw_regs_t *hws[] = { &hw, NULL, NULL, NULL };
> + struct ide_host *host;
> + unsigned long port[2], port_size[2];
> + void __iomem *mmport[2];
> + struct tx4938ide_platform_info *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> + unsigned int ebus_ch;
> + int irq;
> + int ret;
> + int i;
Why not declare all 3 on the same line?
> +
> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (irq < 0)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + ebus_ch = pdata->ebus_ch;
> + port[0] = ((__raw_readq(&tx4938_ebuscptr->cr[ebus_ch]) >> 48) << 20)
> + + 0x10000;
> + port[1] = port[0] + 0x10000;
Why not pass these as platform device resources?
> + port_size[0] = 8;
> + port_size[1] = 1;
> + port[1] += (6 << pdata->ioport_shift);
> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> + port_size[i] <<= pdata->ioport_shift;
Why not do it right in the assignments above?
> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> + if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev,
> + port[i], port_size[i],
> + "tx4938ide"))
> + return -EBUSY;
From the datasheet I got an impression that whole 128 KB at offset 0x10000
trigger IDE -CS0/1 signals, so why not request all 128 KB?
> + mmport[i] = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, port[i], port_size[i]);
> + if (!mmport[i])
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + memset(&hw, 0, sizeof(hw));
> + if (pdata->ioport_shift) {
> + hw.io_ports_array[0] = (unsigned long)mmport[0];
> +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> + mmport[0]++;
> + mmport[1]++;
> +#endif
> + for (i = 1; i <= 7; i++)
> + hw.io_ports_array[i] = (unsigned long)mmport[0] +
> + (i << pdata->ioport_shift);
> + hw.io_ports.ctl_addr = (unsigned long)mmport[1];
> + } else
> + ide_std_init_ports(&hw, (unsigned long)mmport[0],
> + (unsigned long)mmport[1]);
From the datasheet I got an impression that this case is not possible...
MBR, Sergei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ide: Add tx4938ide driver
2008-10-19 16:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov
@ 2008-10-20 14:15 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2008-10-20 16:23 ` Sergei Shtylyov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Atsushi Nemoto @ 2008-10-20 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sshtylyov; +Cc: linux-mips, linux-ide, bzolnier, ralf
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:32:13 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
> > + /* IORDY setup time: 35ns */
> > + wt = (35 + cycle - 1) / cycle;
>
> It's not that simple I'm afraid: you can't just wait IORDY for 35 ns as
> that won't guarantee the minimum DIOx- actime time for the current PIO mode;
> so t->act8 (since it's >= t->act) should be part of the equation here,
> possibly with subtraction of couple cycles, if I'm interpreting the timing
> diagrams in the datasheet correctly...
Hmm... so, does this statement seems correct?
wt = (t->act8b + 35 + cycle - 1) / cycle - 2;
> > + /* actual wait-cycle is max(wt & ~1, 1) */
>
> I got an impression that WT[0] bit is used otherwise in the ready mode,
> and PWT[1:0]:WT[3:1] = 00000 would mean 0 cycles, not 1...
>From "7.3.6.3 Ready Mode":
When the number of wait cycles is 0, READY check is started in
1 cycle after asserting the CE* signal. When the number of
wait cycles is other than zero, after waiting only for the
specified number of cycles, READY check is started.
> > + if (pdata->ioport_shift) {
> > + hw.io_ports_array[0] = (unsigned long)mmport[0];
> > +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> > + mmport[0]++;
> > + mmport[1]++;
> > +#endif
> > + for (i = 1; i <= 7; i++)
> > + hw.io_ports_array[i] = (unsigned long)mmport[0] +
> > + (i << pdata->ioport_shift);
> > + hw.io_ports.ctl_addr = (unsigned long)mmport[1];
> > + } else
> > + ide_std_init_ports(&hw, (unsigned long)mmport[0],
> > + (unsigned long)mmport[1]);
>
> From the datasheet I got an impression that this case is not possible...
Yes, but certanly RBTX4938 works without ioport_shift, with a little
help from IOC-FPGA.
I will accept all other points. Thank you all the time!
---
Atsushi Nemoto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ide: Add tx4938ide driver
2008-10-20 14:15 ` Atsushi Nemoto
@ 2008-10-20 16:23 ` Sergei Shtylyov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2008-10-20 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Atsushi Nemoto; +Cc: linux-mips, linux-ide, bzolnier, ralf
Hello.
Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
>>>+ /* IORDY setup time: 35ns */
>>>+ wt = (35 + cycle - 1) / cycle;
>> It's not that simple I'm afraid: you can't just wait IORDY for 35 ns as
>>that won't guarantee the minimum DIOx- actime time for the current PIO mode;
>>so t->act8 (since it's >= t->act) should be part of the equation here,
>>possibly with subtraction of couple cycles, if I'm interpreting the timing
>>diagrams in the datasheet correctly...
> Hmm... so, does this statement seems correct?
> wt = (t->act8b + 35 + cycle - 1) / cycle - 2;
No need to add the 35 ns since they're counted from the moment -DIOx gets
asserted. It would only make sense to check whether:
wt = DIV_ROUND_UP(t->act8b, cycle) - 2;
is less than the 35 ns minimum, and use 35 ns if so:
wt = max(DIV_ROUND_UP(t->act8b, cycle) - 2, DIV_ROUND_UP(35, cycle));
>>>+ /* actual wait-cycle is max(wt & ~1, 1) */
>> I got an impression that WT[0] bit is used otherwise in the ready mode,
>>and PWT[1:0]:WT[3:1] = 00000 would mean 0 cycles, not 1...
> From "7.3.6.3 Ready Mode":
> When the number of wait cycles is 0, READY check is started in
> 1 cycle after asserting the CE* signal. When the number of
> wait cycles is other than zero, after waiting only for the
> specified number of cycles, READY check is started.
Indeed, I've missed that...
MBR, Sergei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-20 16:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-17 14:11 [PATCH] ide: Add tx4938ide driver Atsushi Nemoto
2008-10-19 16:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-10-20 14:15 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2008-10-20 16:23 ` Sergei Shtylyov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).