linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] IDE updates #4
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:44:55 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48FF2047.6000509@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58cb370e0810220514x419c9669jba1b7be942d3644a@mail.gmail.com>

Hello.

Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

>>> Remove needless/confusing subdirs from drivers/ide/.
>> I think that with 2 new drivers being submitted/reworked based on feedback
>> and several patches submitted and pending submission to the pata-2.6 series
>> this really could have waited till 2.6.29...
>>     
>
> The situation is perfect right now for this change as there are no outstanding
> patches in pata-2.6 tree 

   There was one patch (already stale TX4939 version driver) as of 
yesterday.

> and number of new submitted patches is < 10 (I'll take
> care of fixing them up, ditto for all other new stuff that will be using old
> naming scheme).
>   

   Thanks for clarifying this.
   This rename only added more uncertainty for my pending patchset 
(which had been already dependant on at least TX4939 driver which keeps 
being recast by Atsushi and being stale in pata-2.6 series) as I can't 
predict when you and Linus will merge the changes and this is getting on 
my nerves, as I don't have time on any extra rework and I'm running out 
of time with the submission. I know I should have done this earlier and 
I'd have done this if its not for my unfortunate vacations... I aslso 
kept finding new issues looking on the IOC4 driver. :-/

> Thanks,
> Bart
>   

MBR. Sergei



  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-22 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-21 19:00 [git pull] IDE updates #4 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-21 19:18 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-10-23 21:13   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-22 11:49 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-10-22 12:14   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-22 12:44     ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2008-10-22 21:37       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-22 22:56         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-10-23 15:57           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-10-23 21:07             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-23 22:13               ` Sergei Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48FF2047.6000509@ru.mvista.com \
    --to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).