From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libata: get rid of ATA_MAX_QUEUE loop in ata_qc_complete_multiple() Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:14:13 +0900 Message-ID: <48FFFA15.8060603@kernel.org> References: <1224661243-7929-1-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com> <1224661243-7929-2-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:40803 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751873AbYJWEO1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:14:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1224661243-7929-2-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org Jens Axboe wrote: > @@ -4811,16 +4811,19 @@ int ata_qc_complete_multiple(struct ata_port *ap, u32 qc_active) > return -EINVAL; > } > > - for (i = 0; i < ATA_MAX_QUEUE; i++) { > + while (done_mask) { > struct ata_queued_cmd *qc; > + unsigned int next = __ffs(done_mask); > > - if (!(done_mask & (1 << i))) > - continue; > - > - if ((qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, i))) { > + qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, i + next); > + if (qc) { > ata_qc_complete(qc); > nr_done++; > } > + if (++next >= ATA_MAX_QUEUE) > + break; > + i += next; > + done_mask >>= next; Shouldn't this be... i += next + 1; if (i >= ATA_MAX_QUEUE) break; or better... while (done_mask) { struct ata_queued_cmd *qc; unsigned int next = __ffs(done_mask); tag += next; if ((qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, tag))) { ata_qc_complete(qc); nr_done++; } next++; tag += next; done_mask >>= next; } done_mask is guaranteed to be zero at when tag reaches ATA_MAX_QUEUE. Thanks. -- tejun