From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [git pull] IDE updates #4 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:13:06 +0400 Message-ID: <4900F6F2.6000601@ru.mvista.com> References: <200810212100.52985.bzolnier@gmail.com> <48FFAFBB.8020709@ru.mvista.com> <49009EDA.2030707@ru.mvista.com> <200810232307.15462.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:18684 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753026AbYJWWNP (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:13:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200810232307.15462.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >>>> Also I didn't know anything about your patchset and its >>>> dependency on TX4939, otherwise I'll be pushing things in >>>> >>> The patchset consists of a large patch moving read_sff_dma_status() to >>> its porper place, one small preparatory patch, and 2 followup patches, >>> so unfortunately it's dependent on TX4939 in its main patch (worse, the >>> relevant part of this driver has changed after your last merged driver >>> version)... >>> >>>> different order or even skip this pull request if needed >>>> (TX493x drivers are new stuff and were still under review, >>>> such things can be also submitted after the merge window >>>> closes so they were given the lowest priority). >>>> >>> Unfortunately, that driver has been submitted first back 9/09, long >>> before my patchset was even created, so the dependence was just natural. >>> >> I could also rip out TX4939 part from the patch and leave Atsushi to deal >> with the fallout (though I could give him the ripped out part to simply be >> merged to the driver) if you would queue my patchset ahead of the driver. >> Though I feel it's too late now for my patchset to get into 2.6.28 the way >> things have been happening... :-/ >> > > Ehm, submitting things _before_ the merge window usually help. ;-) > If I only had time to do that... > Anyway, no need to get too frustrated over it. It is normal that > I got used to my bad luck long ago -- this was only a minor series of misfortunes... :-) MBR, Sergei