From: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Elias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>,
tj@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc1 (2fca5c): libata: kernel cant boot
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:28:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4905193D.90607@vc.cvut.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081026173421.GN22217@kernel.dk>
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25 2008, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 25 2008, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
>>> Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 24 2008, Elias Oltmanns wrote:
>>>>> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>> >From e598055dde1951c47c8b3522616f6ebff0ed9847 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>>> From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
>>>>>> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:22:42 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] libata: fix bug with non-ncq devices
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The recent commit 201f1b98822078c808b5e2d379a6ddbfc0a06ee1 to enable
>>>>> Wouldn't that be commit 2fca5ccf97d2c28bcfce44f5b07d85e74e3cd18e?
>>>> Yes that is correct, the other commit is actually a private one in my
>>>> tree for other libata changes. Updated patch below, thanks for checking!
>>>>
>>> >From e598055dde1951c47c8b3522616f6ebff0ed9847 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>> From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
>>>> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:22:42 +0200
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] libata: fix bug with non-ncq devices
>>> Hello,
>>> this fixes my DVD, but unfortunately NCQ devices connected to PMP are
>>> still dead - apparently as soon as mount() tries to do serious I/O on
>>> the drive. Backing out both post-2.6.28-rc1 fix as well as your
>>> original change brings storage back. I suspect that problem is that
>>> with PMP same tag cannot be (should not be? must not be?) used on
>>> multiple devices behind PMP - and before your change tags were allocated
>>> per-port, while now they are allocated per-device.
>> That would indeed break, this requires allocating the tag map in the
>
> Totally untested, does this work?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index 4b95c43..0785c46 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -1107,6 +1107,10 @@ static int ata_scsi_dev_config(struct scsi_device *sdev,
>
> depth = min(sdev->host->can_queue, ata_id_queue_depth(dev->id));
> depth = min(ATA_MAX_QUEUE - 1, depth);
> +
> + if (dev->link->ap->pmp_link)
> + scsi_init_shared_tag_map(sdev->host, ATA_MAX_QUEUE - 1);
> +
> scsi_set_tag_type(sdev, MSG_SIMPLE_TAG);
> scsi_activate_tcq(sdev, depth);
> }
No. It went through same story as without patch - first it declared
drive #2 hung, after port reset drives #0,1,2 were declared hung, after
second port reset drive #2 was declared dead, after third port reset
drive #3 was hung, after fourth reset it said that /dev/sde changed
capacity from 0 to 1TB, and at that point I decided that it is time to
hit alt-sysrq-b to prevent damage...
Also I think that this change leaks memory a bit...
Petr
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-27 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-24 7:04 2.6.27-rc1 (2fca5c): libata: kernel cant boot Alexander Beregalov
2008-10-24 7:09 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-24 7:13 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-24 7:16 ` Paul Mundt
2008-10-24 7:24 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-24 7:32 ` Paul Mundt
2008-10-24 7:44 ` Dave Young
2008-10-24 8:44 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-24 8:48 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-25 11:17 ` Petr Vandrovec
2008-10-25 18:45 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-26 17:34 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-27 1:28 ` Petr Vandrovec [this message]
2008-10-24 7:38 ` [Regression] 2.6.28-rc1 (2fca5c): libata: kernel cant boot (was: Re: 2.6.27-rc1 (2fca5c): libata: kernel cant boot) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-24 7:34 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-24 8:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-24 8:16 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-24 8:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4905193D.90607@vc.cvut.cz \
--to=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=a.beregalov@gmail.com \
--cc=eo@nebensachen.de \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).