linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/22] libata-sff: clear IRQ from ata_sff_error_handler() only when necessary
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:28:56 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49069508.9010504@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <490690CC.50500@garzik.org>

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Clearing IRQ from ata_sff_error_handler() is necessary only when the
>> port is gonna be thawed before performing EH actions and some
>> controllers don't like being accessed after certain fail modes until
>> they're reset.  Clear IRQ iff the port is being thawed.  Also, remove
>> unnecessary ata_sff_sync() while at it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>
> I'll allow it, but, this description is not strictly true.  This
> clearing was done in the error handler unconditionally in an attempt to
> catch outstanding conditions.  The logic being that it is safer (FSVO
> safe) to clear on error just in case interrupts were screaming.

The avoid-IRQ-stream-by-clearing-IRQ doesn't work at all.

1. If the port is already frozen && IRQ is screaming && EH is not gonna
thaw until reset is complete, it doesn't matter.

2. If IRQ is screaming && the port is not frozen or freezing doesn't
work, the IRQ will get killed way before it reaches EH.

So, clearing IRQ there doesn't make any difference w.r.t. screaming IRQ,
about which we really need to do something.  It's one of the most common
bug reports I get these days.

But, yeah, it's probably better to include the above in the commit
message.  I'll update the patch.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-28  4:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-21  9:17 [PATCHSET #upstream] libata: separate out SFF and BMDMA Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 01/22] pata_sch: use ata_pci_sff_init_one() Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 02/22] sata_inic162x: inic162x is not dependent on CONFIG_ATA_SFF Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 03/22] sata_mv: remove unnecessary initialization Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 04/22] libata-sff: clear IRQ from ata_sff_error_handler() only when necessary Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:53   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-10-21 11:45     ` [PATCH 04/22, UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2008-10-28  4:10   ` [PATCH 04/22] " Jeff Garzik
2008-10-28  4:28     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 05/22] libata-sff: kill unused prototype and make ata_dev_select() static Tejun Heo
2010-05-07 13:47   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 06/22] libata: kill ATA_FLAG_DISABLED Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 07/22] sata_inic162x: kill PORT_PRD_ADDR initialization Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 08/22] libata-sff: reorder SFF/BMDMA functions Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 09/22] pata_cmd640/bf54x/icside: fix inheritance Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 10/22] libata-sff: clean up BMDMA initialization Tejun Heo
2008-10-28  4:16   ` Jeff Garzik
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 11/22] libata-sff: introduce ata_sff_init/exit() and ata_sff_port_init() Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 12/22] libata-sff: ap->[last_]ctl are SFF specific Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 13/22] libata-sff: port_task is " Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 14/22] libata-sff: separate out BMDMA EHs Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 15/22] libata-sff: ata_sff_[dumb_]qc_prep are BMDMA specific Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 16/22] libata-sff: prd is " Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 17/22] libata-sff: separate out BMDMA qc_issue Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 18/22] libata-sff: ata_sff_irq_clear() is BMDMA specific Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 19/22] libata-sff: separate out BMDMA irq handler Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 20/22] libata-sff: separate out BMDMA init Tejun Heo
2008-10-21 15:49   ` [PATCH 20/22 UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:17 ` [PATCH 21/22] sata_qstor: kill dummy BMDMA ops Tejun Heo
2008-10-21 10:10   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-10-21 11:27     ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:18 ` [PATCH 22/22] libata-sff: make BMDMA optional Tejun Heo
2008-10-21  9:26 ` [PATCHSET #upstream] libata: separate out SFF and BMDMA Tejun Heo
2008-10-21 11:36 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-10-21 11:43   ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-27 19:43 ` Mark Lord
2008-10-28  1:06   ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-28  4:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-11-03 14:26   ` Tejun Heo
2008-11-04  5:35     ` Jeff Garzik
2008-11-04  5:38       ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-28  4:31 ` [PATCH 04/22 DESC UPDATED] libata-sff: clear IRQ from ata_sff_error_handler() only when necessary Tejun Heo
2010-05-07 13:59 ` [PATCHSET #upstream] libata: separate out SFF and BMDMA Sergei Shtylyov
2010-05-08 15:33   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49069508.9010504@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).