linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes 2/4] libata: beef up iterators
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:58:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <490914C0.8050703@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49090CFF.80101@rtr.ca>

Mark Lord wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> There currently are the following loop constructs.
>>>
>>> * __ata_port_for_each_link() for all available links
>>> * ata_port_for_each_link() for edge links
>>> * ata_link_for_each_dev() for all devices
>>> * ata_link_for_each_dev_reverse() for all devices in reverse order
>>>
>>> Now there's a need for loop construct which is similar to
>>> __ata_port_for_each_link() but iterates over PMP links before the host
>>> link.  Instead of adding another one with long name, do the following
>>> cleanup.
>>>
>>> * Implement and export ata_link_next() and ata_dev_next() which take
>>>   @mode parameter and can be used to build custom loop.
>>> * Implement ata_for_each_link() and ata_for_each_dev() which take
>>>   looping mode explicitly.
>>>
>>> The following iteration modes are implemented.
>>>
>>> * ATA_LITER_EDGE        : loop over edge links
>>> * ATA_LITER_HOST_FIRST        : loop over all links, host link first
>>> * ATA_LITER_PMP_FIRST        : loop over all links, PMP links first
>>>
>>> * ATA_DITER_ENABLED        : loop over enabled devices
>>> * ATA_DITER_ENABLED_REVERSE    : loop over enabled devices in reverse 
>>> order
>>> * ATA_DITER_ALL            : loop over all devices
>>> * ATA_DITER_ALL_REVERSE        : loop over all devices in reverse order
>>>
>>> This change removes exlicit device enabledness checks from many loops
>>> and makes it clear which ones are iterated over in which direction.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/ata/ahci.c           |    8 -
>>>  drivers/ata/ata_generic.c    |    5 -
>>>  drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c    |   19 +---
>>>  drivers/ata/libata-core.c    |  183 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>>  drivers/ata/libata-eh.c      |   84 ++++++++-----------
>>>  drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c     |   22 ++---
>>>  drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c    |   22 ++---
>>>  drivers/ata/pata_it821x.c    |   34 +++----
>>>  drivers/ata/pata_ixp4xx_cf.c |   14 +--
>>>  drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c    |   17 +--
>>>  drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c  |   27 ++----
>>>  drivers/ata/pata_platform.c  |   14 +--
>>>  drivers/ata/pata_rz1000.c    |   16 +--
>>>  drivers/ata/sata_sil.c       |    2  include/linux/libata.h       
>>> |   50 +++++++----
>>>  15 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 238 deletions(-)
>>
>> ACK... for 2.6.29.  I think this is too much change for -rc2.  It's a 
>> good idea though.
>>
>> Also, it could use more documentation than just the commit message... 
>> something that programmers can easily refer to (header file comment?)
> ..
> 
> Yeah.  Especially a reminder of what "LITER" and "DITER" stand for!  :)

Well, DITER stands for device iteration, and LITER stands for an amount 
of petrol... <grin>

	Jeff





  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-30  1:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-26  6:50 [PATCH #upstream-fixes 1/4] libata: fix device iteration bugs Tejun Heo
2008-10-26  6:51 ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 2/4] libata: beef up iterators Tejun Heo
2008-10-26  6:51   ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 3/4] libata: when restoring SControl during detach do the PMP links first Tejun Heo
2008-10-26  6:52     ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 4/4] libata: perform port detach in EH Tejun Heo
2008-10-28  4:02       ` Jeff Garzik
2008-10-26 14:31   ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 2/4] libata: beef up iterators Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-27  9:06     ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-27  9:39       ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-27 10:17         ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-27 11:58           ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-10-28  4:01   ` Jeff Garzik
2008-10-30  1:25     ` Mark Lord
2008-10-30  1:58       ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2008-10-26 10:47 ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 1/4] libata: fix device iteration bugs Sergei Shtylyov
2008-10-27  9:07   ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-27 10:59     ` [PATCH #upstream-fixes 1/4 UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2008-10-28  3:57       ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=490914C0.8050703@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).