From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCHSET #upstream] libata: separate out SFF and BMDMA Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:38:12 +0900 Message-ID: <490FDFC4.6090806@kernel.org> References: <1224580680-13698-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <49069317.3000600@garzik.org> <490F09F8.5070802@kernel.org> <490FDF06.80009@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:48802 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751505AbYKDFiW (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 00:38:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <490FDF06.80009@garzik.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > Tejun Heo wrote: >> Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> ACK patchset >> >> Jeff, are you gonna create #upstream soon? I have other patches >> targeted for #upstream and having a branch open and having patch orders >> fixed there would help a lot. > > Yep, I was waiting on the patchset in $subject to be resent, because > otherwise there was no content for #upstream. > > #tj-upstream sounded like it contained some work for 2.6.28 and some for > later kernels, so I didn't want to pull it verbatim. Ah... it was #tj-upstream before -rc1 opened and just contained fixes and stuff you already acked. I probably should have renamed it to #tj-upstream-fixes. Are you gonna push in the lost patches into 2.6.28? Thanks. -- tejun