From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Clausen Subject: Re: Suspend w/ sata_promise Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:05:13 +0100 Message-ID: <492060D9.20808@gc-web.de> References: <49202CB0.60507@gc-web.de> <18720.18615.938839.921189@harpo.it.uu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from server2.gc-web.de ([88.198.38.110]:55109 "EHLO mail.gc-web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752462AbYKPSFS (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:05:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <18720.18615.938839.921189@harpo.it.uu.se> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mikael Pettersson Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Do you have anything connected to that mobo's VIA SATA ports? If not, > you could move the disk(s) from the Promise controller to the VIA > controller just to see how the machine behaves over repeated suspend/resume > cycles. (I'm not suggesting you move the disks permanently, this would > just be a data gathering experiment.) It works fine (~5 cycles tested) with the PCI (non-onboard) controller (VIA VT6421). Of course I'm still interested in getting suspend to work with the promise chip, so I don't have to waste money on the addon card (the one used in testing is just borrowed) Alex