From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstraem-fixes] ata_piix: detect and clear spurious IRQs
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 11:31:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <492F5803.2080302@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <492D9C30.8080208@kernel.org>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
>>> circumstances, during resume SRST, the drive would raise the IRQ line
>>> regardless of NIEN and will stay that way for several seconds, thus
>>> triggering nobody cared. Other than detecting and clearing the
>>> spurious IRQ, there just isn't much driver can do to work around
>>> problems like this.
>> There is. It also means your patch isn't sufficient - if that IRQ had
>> been level triggered you'd have hung the box solid.
>
> Right, the attached patch fixed it so it must have been the controller
> latching the IRQ.
>
>> The old IDE code makes use of disable_irq/enable_irq (and really ought to
>> make use of on chip private IRQ mask bits as first choice but doesn't).
>>
>> Sounds to me like there are two things we can do to help
>>
>> Make the nIEN masking via a helper that can on suitable chips also mask
>> on chip.
>>
>> Make use of disable_irq_nosync() in the case of devices that ignore nIEN
>> in the IRQ handler, setting a flag then re-enable it when the driver
>> path completes the reset and the bit goes clear.
>>
>> We need to start using enable/disable_irq and/or local chip IRQ masking
>> for PIO in some places anyway.
>
> Agreed. I think we should use disable/enable_irq for all controller
> which don't have proper IRQ masking mechanism (NIEN doesn't count) for
> both reliability and so that we move PIO out of irq handler. Jeff,
> this has come up quite a few times now, what do you think?
OSDL bz#10884 seems to suffer similar problem. The patch fixes it.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10884
We definitely need to do something about it.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-28 2:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-21 4:13 [PATCH #upstraem-fixes] ata_piix: detect and clear spurious IRQs Tejun Heo
2008-11-21 10:25 ` Alan Cox
2008-11-21 13:07 ` Tejun Heo
2008-11-25 17:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-11-26 2:52 ` Tejun Heo
2008-11-26 10:47 ` Alan Cox
2008-11-26 12:26 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-11-26 12:28 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-11-26 12:37 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-11-26 17:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-11-26 17:45 ` Tejun Heo
2008-11-26 18:40 ` Alan Cox
2008-11-26 18:57 ` Tejun Heo
2008-11-28 2:31 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-12-04 16:33 ` Mark Lord
2008-12-04 16:35 ` Alan Cox
2008-11-21 16:59 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-11-21 17:05 ` Tejun Heo
2008-11-25 17:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-11-25 17:15 ` Alan Cox
2008-11-26 2:45 ` Tejun Heo
2008-11-26 10:33 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=492F5803.2080302@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).