linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: blacklist NCQ on OCZ CORE 2 SSD
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 18:36:43 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4946F81B.7020408@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4946C96B.2030603@dsrg.mff.cuni.cz>

Lubomír Bulej wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> after putting a 250G OCZ CORE v2 SSD into my notebook, I have to endure 
> several invocations of the ata EH before the kernel decides to disable 
> NCQ due too many errors. The drive reports NCQ of depth 1, which is 
> probably useless anyway.
> 
> The patchlet below saves me the waiting for the completion of several 
> ata EH invocations, but I'm not sure if this is the right solution. 
> Attached are two dmesg dumps, one with errors and the other with the 
> patchlet compiled in. Attached is also "hdparm -I" of the drive.

I suspect it's all we can really do. NCQ depth of 1 isn't entirely 
useless, as using NCQ commands still allows the drive to send/request 
data for an individual request out of order, which NCQ commands don't 
allow. However, in this case it would appear that the device is sending 
back a bogus all-zeros FIS to the controller which triggers error handling.

The "applying bridge limits" part is interesting, that would imply the 
device's identify data doesn't properly indicate it's actually a SATA 
device so the kernel assumes it's a PATA device behind a SATA bridge. I 
don't think it's related to the problem but it does suggest that whoever 
designed the SATA interface on that thing probably didn't do a ton of 
validation on it..


  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-16  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-15 21:17 [PATCH] libata: blacklist NCQ on OCZ CORE 2 SSD Lubomír Bulej
2008-12-16  0:36 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
     [not found]   ` <49476EC7.5080201@dsrg.mff.cuni.cz>
2008-12-17  1:04     ` Robert Hancock
2008-12-22  8:14 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4946F81B.7020408@shaw.ca \
    --to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).