From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: ICH10R and Samsung HDS724040KLSA80 Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:59:59 +0900 Message-ID: <494F651F.7020809@kernel.org> References: <494EDA84.9000603@shaw.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:35144 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752349AbYLVKAF (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2008 05:00:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <494EDA84.9000603@shaw.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Robert Hancock Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Robert Hancock wrote: > Obviously HPA processing is not being skipped in your case. The existing > blacklist entry only covers HDS724040KLSA80 with firmware KFAOA20N. Your > drive might be a different firmware version (it's not possible to tell > from this log as the SCSI message only shows the first 4 characters of > the firmware). Can you can tell what the firmware version is (hdparm -I > on the drive, I believe, if you can get it to be recognized)? Yeah, it looks like either a broken firmware or PHYs don't like each other on 3.0Gbps. Does "libata.force=2:1.5Gbps" help? -- tejun