linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Cc: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>, Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	ide <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PIO with SSDs: needs a long DRQ-after-command timeout for WRITEs
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:06:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <495BB48C.3090408@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <495BACD2.6020500@shaw.ca>

Robert Hancock wrote:

>>> No idea about IDE, but libata does not wait at all for DRQ assertion 
>>> specifically, after issuing the PIO command it waits for BSY to be 
>>> deasserted and then expects either DRQ, DF or ERR to be set, else 
>>> it's a host state machine violation and triggers error handling. 
>>> According to the ATA spec, the device is specifically not allowed to 
>>> set DRQ to one while BSY is not asserted.

> IDE is really only waiting 50msec in this case? That seems rather 

    The whole 100 ms if you look at how WAIT_DRQ is #define'd...

MBR, Sergei

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-12-31 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-30 13:53 PIO with SSDs: needs a long DRQ-after-command timeout for WRITEs Mark Lord
2008-12-30 13:59 ` Alan Cox
2008-12-31 16:29   ` Mark Lord
2008-12-31 18:38     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-31 20:30       ` Mark Lord
2008-12-30 18:14 ` Robert Hancock
     [not found]   ` <495B9D31.6080904@rtr.ca>
2008-12-31 17:33     ` Robert Hancock
2008-12-31 18:03       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-12-31 18:06       ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=495BB48C.3090408@ru.mvista.com \
    --to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=alan@redhat.com \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).