From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: export SSD/non-rotational queue flag through sysfs
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:39:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4964866D.8010503@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090106073515.GY32491@kernel.dk>
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05 2009, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 19:54, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 05 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>>>> +static struct queue_sysfs_entry queue_nonrot_entry = {
>>>> + .attr = {.name = "nonrot", .mode = S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR },
>>>> + .show = queue_nonrot_show,
>>>> + .store = queue_nonrot_store,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>> Lets please use a better name for export reasons, non-rotational is a
>>> lot better. Nobody will know what nonrot means :-)
>> What's that negation good for? Can't we just have "rotational", like
>> we have "removable" and not "non-removable"? :)
>
> Non-rotational is the term typically used, since rotational is the norm
> (still). So I think the negation actually makes sense in this case :-)
You used the word "still" yourself. I mean, in 5 years SSD will be more
common than rotational media, and "the norm" will be !rotational..
So let's name them correctly and uniformly from the beginning.. ;)
/mjt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-07 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 18:52 [PATCH] block: export SSD/non-rotational queue flag through sysfs Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-05 18:54 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-05 19:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-05 19:08 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-05 19:10 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-05 19:08 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-05 21:47 ` Kay Sievers
2009-01-06 7:35 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-07 10:39 ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2009-01-07 11:19 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-07 15:34 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-15 5:37 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-15 15:07 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-01-15 15:46 ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-15 16:06 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-15 18:55 ` Grant Grundler
2009-01-15 19:00 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-15 22:45 ` Grant Grundler
2009-01-15 23:17 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-15 23:50 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-01-15 23:57 ` Michael Tokarev
2009-01-16 0:36 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-16 3:52 ` Dongjun Shin
2009-01-16 6:48 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-16 6:48 ` Jens Axboe
2009-02-03 12:32 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-01-16 6:43 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-05 18:58 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <fa.+H1UnEqOmFht/vMPmVy8ellbQi0@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.RLz5WOGorLui5GRkc963Ww1kXqg@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.x4ejZ7Kj7ZZRu88Sond1Cap6XxY@ifi.uio.no>
2009-01-05 22:18 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-01-06 1:25 ` Stefan Richter
2009-01-06 19:46 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4964866D.8010503@msgid.tls.msk.ru \
--to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).