Re: sata_mv: trial fix for lost NCQ interrupts

[Artem Bokhan <aptem@ngs.ru>]

Sounds great! Sorry, but I can't check the patch in the near future, I 
don't have necessary hardware at the moment :(

Mark Lord пишет:
> Harri Olin wrote:
>> ..
>> After first 55 minutes of testing, no timeouts yet, so I'm quite sure 
>> it works ok now (yay!). Without this patch, timeouts happened every 
>> couple minutes on similar load. I think I'll let it run for a day and 
>> report back tomorrow how things are by then.
> ..
>
> Okay, we have a winner!
> I just need to get the "okay" from Marvell,
> and then I'll feed this patch for 2.6.29 and earlier -stable streams.
>
>> Note that I didn't apply the previous patch as they don't apply on 
>> each other. If needed, I can test it separately after running this 
>> for a while.
> ..
>
> No need. The earlier patch has no effect, other than speeding up your 
> system
> by a slight amount. I'll submit that for upstream separately, along 
> with a
> fix for another "duh!" I noticed in the code.
>
> In the meanwhile, you should keep the working patch (obviously)
> in your kernels -- the same/similar patch will apply to earlier
> kernels if needed.
>
> Thanks to you and Brian for the legwork!
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html