From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [git patches] libata hibernation fixes Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:39:13 -0500 Message-ID: <49739371.5030107@garzik.org> References: <20081104062734.GA4420@havoc.gtf.org> <200901111343.49901.rjw@sisk.pl> <200901181120.08992.elendil@planet.nl> <200901182125.04060.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:50502 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753640AbZARUjg (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:39:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200901182125.04060.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Frans Pop , tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday 18 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote: >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> There is a name conflict with a change applied after this patchset had >>> been created. The appended patch fixes it for me. >> [...] >>> @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ const struct dmi_system_id *dmi_first_match(const struct dmi_system_id *list) >>> const struct dmi_system_id *d; >>> >>> for (d = list; d->ident; d++) >>> - if (dmi_match(d)) >>> + if (dmi_matches(d)) >>> return d; >> I get two warnings when compiling your patch with this correction on top: > > Hm, there were more patches than one, so I'm not sure. When I apply all of > them, I don't see these error, but perhaps I should resend the entire series. > Will do tomorrow. That would be useful... I was planning to regenerate the series, but this would save time. Thanks! Jeff