From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] at91_ide driver Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:20:49 +0300 Message-ID: <49749A51.3000504@ru.mvista.com> References: <200901141345.42583.stf_xl@wp.pl> <200901161603.03699.stf_xl@wp.pl> <4970A8FF.4080404@ru.mvista.com> <200901191251.25880.stf_xl@wp.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:54665 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751433AbZASPUU (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:20:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200901191251.25880.stf_xl@wp.pl> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Stanislaw Gruszka Cc: Alan Cox , Andrew Victor , Nicolas Ferre , Haavard Skinnemoen , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , ddaney@caviumnetworks.com Hello. Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: >>>I use t9 for calculating memory controller settings, but maybe it is >>>unneeded, pata_at91 don't use this value. >> You mean pata_at32? It might have been that this detail was missed... > Yes at32 of course. Now I'm trying to figure out difference between settings > in at32 and my code. They differ, so one driver (I suspect my) is probably > wrong. I'm going to post the deatiled review af your patch RSN. I've even got so far as to reading Atmel's dataheets (well, it wasn't for the first time as I had some experience with their AVR8 mictocotrollers :-). > Stanislaw Gruszka MBR, Sergei