linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: libata, devm_*, and MSI ?
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:03:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4975F5C1.8090107@rtr.ca> (raw)

Tejun / Jeff,

I am working on MSI support for sata_mv, and am trying to puzzle out
exactly what the kernel expects for this.  Looking at other drivers,
both libata and otherwise, yields a variety of conflicting implementations.

For starters, the MSI HOW-TO suggests that drivers must be careful
to invoke pci_disable_msi() on module unload, but I don't see that
happening anywhere in libata.

Unless, Tejun, the devm_* routines automatically do this.. do they?

Next, there's no mention of a need for invoking pci_intx() in the HOW-TO,
yet some device drivers call it, and others do not.

Eg. from ahci.c, we have this:

        if ((hpriv->flags & AHCI_HFLAG_NO_MSI) || pci_enable_msi(pdev))
                pci_intx(pdev, 1);

Which agrees with the existing code in sata_mv:

        if (msi && pci_enable_msi(pdev))
                pci_intx(pdev, 1);

Which seems to call pci_intx() only when MSI is *not* used.  Fine.
But then in sata_vsc.c, we do sort of the opposite:

        if (pci_enable_msi(pdev) == 0)
                pci_intx(pdev, 0);

Either that one is wrong, or pci_intx() is unnecessary in all cases.
Again, the MSI HOW-TO doesn't even mention this routine.

Looking through the network drivers, it seems that some of them
do the pci_intx(pdev,1) call for the cases where pci_enable_msi() fails,
similar to ahci.c and sata_mv.c.

But not all of them do that.

Perhaps somebody from the PCI side of things might enlighten us all.

Thanks

             reply	other threads:[~2009-01-20 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-20 16:03 Mark Lord [this message]
2009-01-20 16:07 ` libata, devm_*, and MSI ? Mark Lord
2009-01-20 17:44 ` Grant Grundler
2009-01-20 18:16   ` Mark Lord
2009-01-20 18:51     ` Grant Grundler
2009-01-20 19:54       ` Mark Lord
2009-01-21 11:59         ` Tejun Heo
2009-01-20 21:50 ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-01-21  3:39   ` Mark Lord
2009-01-21  4:02     ` Grant Grundler
2009-01-21  4:16       ` Michael Ellerman
2009-01-21 15:05         ` Mark Lord
2009-01-22  0:33           ` Robert Hancock
2009-01-23 18:11             ` Mark Lord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4975F5C1.8090107@rtr.ca \
    --to=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).