From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: bzolnier@gmail.com, jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
gdu@mns.spb.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide/libata: fix ata_id_is_cfa()
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:53:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4979CBC1.3040106@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090123133352.60add80e@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Hello.
Alan Cox wrote:
>>When checking for CFA feature set support, ata_id_is_cfa() tests bit 2 in word
>>82 of the identify data instead the word 83. It also checks the ATA revision
>>in the word 80 instead of usual validity check for the words 82-83 -- word 83
>>bit 14 set, bit 15 cleared.
> The word 82 validity bit is not sufficient as that bit is itself not
There's no word 82 validity bits, its validity bits are in word 83.
> defined in ATA < 3. Otherwise the change looks correct.
Well, then we need to fix every case of using *only* the validity bits in
ata.h. Go ahead. ;-)
> Alan
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-23 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-23 13:15 [PATCH] ide/libata: fix ata_id_is_cfa() Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-23 13:33 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-23 13:53 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2009-01-23 15:43 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-23 16:30 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-23 16:41 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-23 17:01 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-23 17:12 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-23 17:18 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-23 17:27 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-23 17:53 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-23 19:13 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-24 23:06 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-25 10:50 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-26 11:49 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 12:01 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-26 18:11 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 19:01 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-26 19:25 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-25 10:52 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-25 19:04 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-26 19:32 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 18:47 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 19:08 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-26 19:28 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 19:33 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 19:41 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-26 19:42 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-26 19:56 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 20:01 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-26 20:31 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 20:59 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 21:22 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-26 21:38 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 21:43 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 23:28 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 20:47 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 19:39 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-26 19:31 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 19:35 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-26 19:45 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 19:54 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-26 20:03 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 20:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-01-26 20:23 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 20:33 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-26 20:41 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 23:53 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-26 20:16 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-01-27 11:29 ` Sergei Shtylyov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4979CBC1.3040106@ru.mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=gdu@mns.spb.ru \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).