From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Thomas Reitmayr <treitmayr@devbase.at>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Bishara <saeed@marvell.com>,
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com>,
Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: Properly initialize main irq mask
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:39:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <497DA106.7080909@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232825098.13899.52.camel@localhost>
Thomas Reitmayr wrote:
> Hi,
> I noticed that during initialization sata_mv.c assumes that the main
> interrupt mask has its default value of 0. The function
> mv_platform_probe(..) initializes a shadow irq mask with 0 assuming
> that's the value of the controller's register. Now
> mv_set_main_irq_mask(..) only writes the controller's register if the
> new value differs from the "shadowed" value. This is fatal when trying
> to disable all interrupts in mv_init_host(..), i.e. the following
> function call does not write anything to the main irq mask register:
> mv_set_main_irq_mask(host, ~0, 0);
>
> The effect I see on my machine (QNAP TS-109 II) with booting via kexec
> (with Linux as a 2nd-stage boot loader) is that if the sata_mv module
> was still loaded when performing kexec, then the new kernel's sata_mv
> module starts up with interrupts enabled. This results in an unhandled
> IRQ and breaks the boot process.
>
> The unhandled interrupt itself might also be fixed by Lennert's patch
> proposed at http://markmail.org/message/kwvzxstnlsa3s26w which I did not
> try yet.
> However I still propose to additionally initialize the shadow variable
> with the current contents of the main irq mask register to get both in
> sync and allow proper disabling the main irq mask. This fixes the
> unhandled irq on my machine.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Reitmayr <treitmayr@devbase.at>
applied
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-26 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-24 19:24 [PATCH] sata_mv: Properly initialize main irq mask Thomas Reitmayr
2009-01-26 11:39 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=497DA106.7080909@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=buytenh@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeed@marvell.com \
--cc=tbm@cyrius.com \
--cc=treitmayr@devbase.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).