From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide/libata: fix ata_id_is_cfa() Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:47:26 +0300 Message-ID: <497E215E.20007@ru.mvista.com> References: <200901231615.38011.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <497B9EE4.8010807@ru.mvista.com> <497E0548.80904@ru.mvista.com> <20090126190801.7d198246@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <497E0EF3.2000201@ru.mvista.com> <497E101C.9040008@ru.mvista.com> <20090126194237.4897b6ce@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <497E1550.1000501@ru.mvista.com> <20090126200143.733b0cec@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:5002 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752056AbZAZUq5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:46:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090126200143.733b0cec@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: bzolnier@gmail.com, jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, gdu@mns.spb.ru Alan Cox wrote: >> I have explained everything in the prior mail. I hadn't expect you to >>start the patch fencing. > I don't see an explanation just points I queried. I shall draw the obvious > conclusion from the fact you don't feel like providing one > The logic is this > ATA-3 or higher - that word has a defined meaning > ATA < 3 that word should be 0x0000 Dunno why but I removed my remark: they are reserved and so "shall be zero" starting aith ATA-1. I've already stated that. MBR, Sergei