* [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742
@ 2007-07-09 13:38 Alan Cox
2007-07-12 21:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-01 13:49 ` [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch " Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2007-07-09 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ide, akpm, jeff
Underneath all the HPT packaging, PCI identifiers, binary driver modules
and stuff you find that ...
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
--- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c~ 2007-07-09 13:19:57.003052904 +0100
+++ drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2007-07-09 13:19:57.004052752 +0100
@@ -573,6 +573,9 @@
{ PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5041), chip_504x },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5080), chip_5080 },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5081), chip_508x },
+ /* RocketRAID 1740/174x have different identifiers */
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_508x },
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_508x },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x6040), chip_604x },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x6041), chip_604x },
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742
2007-07-09 13:38 [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742 Alan Cox
@ 2007-07-12 21:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-13 14:07 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-27 21:15 ` Mark Lord
2007-08-01 13:49 ` [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch " Jeff Garzik
1 sibling, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2007-07-12 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-ide, akpm
Alan Cox wrote:
> Underneath all the HPT packaging, PCI identifiers, binary driver modules
> and stuff you find that ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
>
> --- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c~ 2007-07-09 13:19:57.003052904 +0100
> +++ drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2007-07-09 13:19:57.004052752 +0100
> @@ -573,6 +573,9 @@
> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5041), chip_504x },
> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5080), chip_5080 },
> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5081), chip_508x },
> + /* RocketRAID 1740/174x have different identifiers */
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_508x },
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_508x },
If your testers could re-test on top of what I just submitted to Linus,
that would be most helpful. My non-RocketRAID 5081 works just fine, but
sata_mv received some major changes and bug fixes, which could
potentially change behavior here.
Since we're guessing (I assume?), I definitely want to make sure we have
the correct MV variant for use with RocketRAID.
Any idea if RocketRAID is marketed as SATA-II or with NCQ support?
("queueing" in marketing lit doesn't help, alas).
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742
2007-07-12 21:00 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2007-07-13 14:07 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-27 21:15 ` Mark Lord
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2007-07-13 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: linux-ide, akpm
> Since we're guessing (I assume?), I definitely want to make sure we have
> the correct MV variant for use with RocketRAID.
We are not guessing. There is sufficient information in the driver to
identify the specific chip variant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742
2007-07-12 21:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-13 14:07 ` Alan Cox
@ 2009-01-27 21:15 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-27 21:21 ` [PATCH] sata_mv: Fix chip type for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740 Mark Lord
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Mark Lord @ 2009-01-27 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik, Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-ide
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 15:38:43 +0200
> Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 2007-08-01 17:46, Alan Cox wrote:
>> > On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:49:19 -0400
>> > Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Alan Cox wrote:
>> >>> Underneath all the HPT packaging, PCI identifiers, binary driver modules
>> >>> and stuff you find that ...
>> >>>
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>
>> >>> --- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c~ 2007-07-09 13:19:57.003052904 +0100
>> >>> +++ drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2007-07-09 13:19:57.004052752 +0100
>> >>> @@ -573,6 +573,9 @@
>> >>> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5041), chip_504x },
>> >>> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5080), chip_5080 },
>> >>> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5081), chip_508x },
>> >>> + /* RocketRAID 1740/174x have different identifiers */
>> >>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_508x },
>> >>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_508x },
>> >> Is this still a test patch, or can it go upstream?
>> >
>> > Upstream
>>
>> Are you sure that 1740/1742 are 508x (GEN I)? According to these [1]
>> pictures there may be a 6042 chipset (GEN IIe) placed onboard.
>
> The ones I checked and the code used as a reference clearly indicate a
> 508x. I've had two reports of a TTI 0x23xx ID number which may perhaps be
> a 6042 as it didn't appear to work with a 508x driver.
>
> Alan
..
Dredging up an old posting here:
Alan/Jeff, I've now got two reports that the above patch is not correct
for the Highpoint RocketRAID 1740 cards.
PCI ID 1103:1740 is clearly a Marvell 6042 chip, not a 5081.
Patch to correct this is coming shortly.
Cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH] sata_mv: Fix chip type for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740
2009-01-27 21:15 ` Mark Lord
@ 2009-01-27 21:21 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-27 21:25 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-27 21:33 ` [PATCH] sata_mv: Fix chip type for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742 Mark Lord
0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Mark Lord @ 2009-01-27 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Alan Cox, linux-ide, stable
Fix chip type for the Highpoint RocketRAID 1740 4-port PCI(-X) card.
It really has a Marvell 6042 on it, rather than a (8-port) 5081 chip.
Confirmed by multiple (two) users.
Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
---
This patch is a candidate for linux-stable as well.
--- old/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2009-01-27 16:03:08.000000000 -0500
+++ linux/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2009-01-27 16:05:15.000000000 -0500
@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@
{ PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5081), chip_508x },
/* RocketRAID 1720/174x have different identifiers */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1720), chip_6042 },
- { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_508x },
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_6042 },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_508x },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x6040), chip_604x },
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: Fix chip type for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740
2009-01-27 21:21 ` [PATCH] sata_mv: Fix chip type for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740 Mark Lord
@ 2009-01-27 21:25 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-27 21:33 ` [PATCH] sata_mv: Fix chip type for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742 Mark Lord
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Mark Lord @ 2009-01-27 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Alan Cox, linux-ide, stable
Mark Lord wrote:
> Fix chip type for the Highpoint RocketRAID 1740 4-port PCI(-X) card.
> It really has a Marvell 6042 on it, rather than a (8-port) 5081 chip.
> Confirmed by multiple (two) users.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
> ---
>
> This patch is a candidate for linux-stable as well.
>
> --- old/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2009-01-27 16:03:08.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2009-01-27 16:05:15.000000000 -0500
> @@ -663,7 +663,7 @@
> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5081), chip_508x },
> /* RocketRAID 1720/174x have different identifiers */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1720), chip_6042 },
> - { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_508x },
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_6042 },
> { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_508x },
>
> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x6040), chip_604x },
..
Here's some definitive supporting documentation:
http://www.highpoint-tech.com/image/products/SATAII/RR1740_card_big.jpg
Cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH] sata_mv: Fix chip type for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742
2009-01-27 21:21 ` [PATCH] sata_mv: Fix chip type for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740 Mark Lord
2009-01-27 21:25 ` Mark Lord
@ 2009-01-27 21:33 ` Mark Lord
2009-02-03 3:42 ` Jeff Garzik
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Mark Lord @ 2009-01-27 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: Alan Cox, linux-ide, stable
Fix chip type for the Highpoint RocketRAID 1740 and 1742 PCI cards.
These really do have Marvell 6042 chips on them, rather than the 5081 chip.
Confirmed by multiple (two) users (for the 1740), and by examining
the product photographs from Highpoint's web site.
Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
---
This replaces the earlier 1740-only version of the patch.
This patch is a candidate for linux-stable as well.
--- old/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2009-01-27 16:03:08.000000000 -0500
+++ linux/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2009-01-27 16:28:15.000000000 -0500
@@ -663,8 +663,8 @@
{ PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5081), chip_508x },
/* RocketRAID 1720/174x have different identifiers */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1720), chip_6042 },
- { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_508x },
- { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_508x },
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_6042 },
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_6042 },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x6040), chip_604x },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x6041), chip_604x },
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: Fix chip type for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742
2009-01-27 21:33 ` [PATCH] sata_mv: Fix chip type for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742 Mark Lord
@ 2009-02-03 3:42 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2009-02-03 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Lord; +Cc: Alan Cox, linux-ide, stable
Mark Lord wrote:
> Fix chip type for the Highpoint RocketRAID 1740 and 1742 PCI cards.
> These really do have Marvell 6042 chips on them, rather than the 5081 chip.
>
> Confirmed by multiple (two) users (for the 1740), and by examining
> the product photographs from Highpoint's web site.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
> ---
> This replaces the earlier 1740-only version of the patch.
> This patch is a candidate for linux-stable as well.
>
> --- old/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2009-01-27 16:03:08.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2009-01-27 16:28:15.000000000 -0500
> @@ -663,8 +663,8 @@
> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5081), chip_508x },
> /* RocketRAID 1720/174x have different identifiers */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1720), chip_6042 },
> - { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_508x },
> - { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_508x },
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_6042 },
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_6042 },
>
> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x6040), chip_604x },
applied
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742
2007-07-09 13:38 [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742 Alan Cox
2007-07-12 21:00 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2007-08-01 13:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-01 15:46 ` Alan Cox
1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2007-08-01 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-ide, akpm
Alan Cox wrote:
> Underneath all the HPT packaging, PCI identifiers, binary driver modules
> and stuff you find that ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
>
> --- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c~ 2007-07-09 13:19:57.003052904 +0100
> +++ drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2007-07-09 13:19:57.004052752 +0100
> @@ -573,6 +573,9 @@
> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5041), chip_504x },
> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5080), chip_5080 },
> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5081), chip_508x },
> + /* RocketRAID 1740/174x have different identifiers */
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_508x },
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_508x },
Is this still a test patch, or can it go upstream?
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742
2007-08-01 13:49 ` [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch " Jeff Garzik
@ 2007-08-01 15:46 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-01 13:38 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2007-08-01 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: linux-ide, akpm
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:49:19 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > Underneath all the HPT packaging, PCI identifiers, binary driver modules
> > and stuff you find that ...
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
> >
> > --- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c~ 2007-07-09 13:19:57.003052904 +0100
> > +++ drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2007-07-09 13:19:57.004052752 +0100
> > @@ -573,6 +573,9 @@
> > { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5041), chip_504x },
> > { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5080), chip_5080 },
> > { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5081), chip_508x },
> > + /* RocketRAID 1740/174x have different identifiers */
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_508x },
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_508x },
>
> Is this still a test patch, or can it go upstream?
Upstream
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742
2007-08-01 15:46 ` Alan Cox
@ 2007-09-01 13:38 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2007-09-01 13:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-01 14:49 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Oledzki @ 2007-09-01 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: Jeff Garzik, linux-ide, akpm
On 2007-08-01 17:46, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:49:19 -0400
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:
>
>> Alan Cox wrote:
>>> Underneath all the HPT packaging, PCI identifiers, binary driver modules
>>> and stuff you find that ...
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> --- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c~ 2007-07-09 13:19:57.003052904 +0100
>>> +++ drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2007-07-09 13:19:57.004052752 +0100
>>> @@ -573,6 +573,9 @@
>>> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5041), chip_504x },
>>> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5080), chip_5080 },
>>> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5081), chip_508x },
>>> + /* RocketRAID 1740/174x have different identifiers */
>>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_508x },
>>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_508x },
>> Is this still a test patch, or can it go upstream?
>
> Upstream
Are you sure that 1740/1742 are 508x (GEN I)? According to these [1]
pictures there may be a 6042 chipset (GEN IIe) placed onboard.
[1] http://www.highpoint-tech.com/image/products/SATAII/RR1740_card_big.jpg
http://www.highpoint-tech.com/image/products/eSATA/RR1742_card_big.jpg
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742
2007-09-01 13:38 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
@ 2007-09-01 13:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-01 14:49 ` Alan Cox
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2007-09-01 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Oledzki; +Cc: Alan Cox, linux-ide, akpm
Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
> On 2007-08-01 17:46, Alan Cox wrote:
>> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:49:19 -0400
>> Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Alan Cox wrote:
>>>> Underneath all the HPT packaging, PCI identifiers, binary driver
>>>> modules
>>>> and stuff you find that ...
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> --- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c~ 2007-07-09 13:19:57.003052904 +0100
>>>> +++ drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2007-07-09 13:19:57.004052752 +0100
>>>> @@ -573,6 +573,9 @@
>>>> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5041), chip_504x },
>>>> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5080), chip_5080 },
>>>> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5081), chip_508x },
>>>> + /* RocketRAID 1740/174x have different identifiers */
>>>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_508x },
>>>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_508x },
>>> Is this still a test patch, or can it go upstream?
>>
>> Upstream
>
> Are you sure that 1740/1742 are 508x (GEN I)? According to these [1]
> pictures there may be a 6042 chipset (GEN IIe) placed onboard.
>
> [1] http://www.highpoint-tech.com/image/products/SATAII/RR1740_card_big.jpg
> http://www.highpoint-tech.com/image/products/eSATA/RR1742_card_big.jpg
Good evidence!
"SATAII" is also an indicator that it is not 508x.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742
2007-09-01 13:38 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2007-09-01 13:50 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2007-09-01 14:49 ` Alan Cox
1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2007-09-01 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Oledzki; +Cc: Jeff Garzik, linux-ide, akpm
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 15:38:43 +0200
Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@ans.pl> wrote:
> On 2007-08-01 17:46, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:49:19 -0400
> > Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Alan Cox wrote:
> >>> Underneath all the HPT packaging, PCI identifiers, binary driver modules
> >>> and stuff you find that ...
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
> >>>
> >>> --- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c~ 2007-07-09 13:19:57.003052904 +0100
> >>> +++ drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2007-07-09 13:19:57.004052752 +0100
> >>> @@ -573,6 +573,9 @@
> >>> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5041), chip_504x },
> >>> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5080), chip_5080 },
> >>> { PCI_VDEVICE(MARVELL, 0x5081), chip_508x },
> >>> + /* RocketRAID 1740/174x have different identifiers */
> >>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1740), chip_508x },
> >>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x1742), chip_508x },
> >> Is this still a test patch, or can it go upstream?
> >
> > Upstream
>
> Are you sure that 1740/1742 are 508x (GEN I)? According to these [1]
> pictures there may be a 6042 chipset (GEN IIe) placed onboard.
The ones I checked and the code used as a reference clearly indicate a
508x. I've had two reports of a TTI 0x23xx ID number which may perhaps be
a 6042 as it didn't appear to work with a 508x driver.
Alan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-03 3:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-09 13:38 [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742 Alan Cox
2007-07-12 21:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-13 14:07 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-27 21:15 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-27 21:21 ` [PATCH] sata_mv: Fix chip type for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740 Mark Lord
2009-01-27 21:25 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-27 21:33 ` [PATCH] sata_mv: Fix chip type for Hightpoint RocketRaid 1740/1742 Mark Lord
2009-02-03 3:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-01 13:49 ` [PATCH] sata_mv: Test patch " Jeff Garzik
2007-08-01 15:46 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-01 13:38 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2007-09-01 13:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-01 14:49 ` Alan Cox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).
