linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linda Walsh <lkml@tlinx.org>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Port Multiplier access with Sil 3124
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:01:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4990A7C1.5060904@tlinx.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da824cf30902090126p5e031e09q5b93da7a296bc849@mail.gmail.com>

Grant Grundler wrote:
> Linda,
> Please tell us which kernel version you have and include the dmesg
> output. Port multiplier support is generally working in 2.6.26 (and later
> releases) for several drivers.  PM support was added after 2.6.20.
---
    Sorry.  I'm a bit behind the edge at 2.6.27.3 --
but I tried a boot w/2.6.28.3 and didn't see a difference (had to return
to 27.3 as I accidently disabled a different driver and haven't regened it.

>
> Where did you find 350MB/s theoretical?
> Link is 8b10b encoded. So it's 10:1 of bits to bytes conversion of link rate.
> 3Gb/s --> 300MB/s in theory.
---
    Yep.  Forgot about that... was forgetting about the 2-bits of overhead,
so was using 3Gb/8/(1024*1024) -> 357.6, which I rounded down to 350... 
but forgot about the 10/8 encoding (just as I get rid of that conversion
habit from modem days, now I have to remember it as a special case for
SATA...:-)  ).

>
> For MB/s, it depends on the SATA controller. Don't expect more then
> 225-235 MB/s per port. At least one sata_sil3124 chip (3126?) is buggy
> and won't do more than 120MB/s read for all ports (170 MB/s write).
> See linux-ide archives for discussion on this.
---
    That's horrible!  I'd definitely call that a bug.  Right now,
the fastest I'm getting on my single ATA's is 70-80MB/s.  I could
get that per/ATA port.  So 120MB read for 4 SATA ports would be
a giant step backwards (170MB/s write?  write faster than read?)



  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-09 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-08 20:38 Port Multiplier access with Sil 3124 Linda Walsh
2009-02-09  9:26 ` Grant Grundler
2009-02-09 22:01   ` Linda Walsh [this message]
2009-02-09 14:35 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-02-09 20:09   ` Mark Lord
2009-02-09 22:22   ` Linda Walsh
2009-02-09 23:01     ` Greg Freemyer
2009-02-10  0:15       ` Jeff Garzik
2009-02-10  1:07         ` Linda Walsh
2009-02-10  3:48           ` Jeff Garzik
2009-02-11  2:09           ` Tejun Heo
2009-02-12  4:16             ` Robert Hancock
2009-02-10  3:25         ` Greg Freemyer
2009-02-11  2:12 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4990A7C1.5060904@tlinx.org \
    --to=lkml@tlinx.org \
    --cc=grundler@google.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).