From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: SATL support for hdparm? Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:15:36 -0500 Message-ID: <49975EA8.4090804@pobox.com> References: <20090214222114.GI17914@xi.wantstofly.org> <49975A6D.4010608@pobox.com> <20090215000603.GK17914@xi.wantstofly.org> <49975D28.4050101@pobox.com> <20090215001355.GL17914@xi.wantstofly.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:50354 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752440AbZBOAPn (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:15:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090215001355.GL17914@xi.wantstofly.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Lennert Buytenhek Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, dgilbert@interlog.com Lennert Buytenhek wrote: .. > Turns out I was stracing /sbin/hdparm and not ./hdparm (doh). If I > strace the right binary I get: > > ioctl(3, SG_IO, {'S', SG_DXFER_NONE, cmd[12]=[a1, 06, 20, 05, fd, 00, 00, 00, 40, ef, 00, 00], mx_sb_len=32, iovec_count=0, dxfer_len=0, timeout=5000, flags=0, status=02, masked_status=01, sb[22]=[72, 0b, 00, 00, 00, 00, 00, 0e, 09, 0c, 00, 04, 00, fd, 00, 00, 00, 00, 00, 00, 40, 51], host_status=0, driver_status=0x8, resid=0, duration=1, info=0x1}) = 0 > > Does that mean the drive doesn't support SET_FEATURES/{05,85} (weird)? .. Dunno.. do this instead, and show the output: hdparm --verbose -B /dev/sdb -- Mark Lord Real-Time Remedies Inc. mlord@pobox.com