From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/06] sata_mv: cache frequently read registers Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:20:56 -0500 Message-ID: <49A5A828.1090300@pobox.com> References: <4994FF3D.90904@rtr.ca> <499A029A.1060101@pobox.com> <499A26B8.7070107@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:59804 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756673AbZBYUVB (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:21:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <499A26B8.7070107@pobox.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Linux IDE mailing list Mark Lord wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: > .. >> ACK patches 1-6 >> >> however, they do not seem to apply to libata-dev.git#upstream, which >> already has several sata_mv changes in it. >> >> Can you regenerate please? No need to copy the list on resend, unless >> the patch content changes.... > .. > > Mmm.. strange. Here (attached) are the six patches again, > along with what my git here gives for the upstream copy of sata_mv.c > from *before* applying the patches. Sorry for the delay... the attachments applied and worked just fine. I eyeballed the first patch and it looked the same as your emailed first patch, so I'm guessing there was an email bugaboo somewhere, rather than a patch content problem. Applied all 6 to #upstream. Jeff