From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ahci 0000:00:1f.2: DMA-API: device driver maps memory from stack
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:38:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A8A3BB.9070903@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090227184250.3dd6e7ce@dhcp-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com>
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> With v3 of the DMA API debug patchset:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:515 check_for_stack+0x78/0x9a() (Not tainted)
> Hardware name: 74585FU
> ahci 0000:00:1f.2: DMA-API: device driver maps memory from stack
> [addr=ffff880137929c00]
> Modules linked in:
> Pid: 645, comm: scsi_eh_1 Not tainted 2.6.29-0.172.rc6.git4.fc11.x86_64 #1
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8104ba7b>] warn_slowpath+0xbc/0xf0
> [<ffffffff81060061>] ? sys_timer_gettime+0x80/0x9b
> [<ffffffff8101781b>] ? native_sched_clock+0x2d/0x5a
> [<ffffffff810170b5>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0xc
> [<ffffffff811a72a0>] ? dma_entry_alloc+0x7e/0x86
> [<ffffffff81395baf>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x58
> [<ffffffff811a6677>] check_for_stack+0x78/0x9a
> [<ffffffff811a73f3>] debug_dma_map_sg+0xd8/0x104
> [<ffffffff81263b0a>] ata_qc_issue+0x1f3/0x289
> [<ffffffff812641ce>] ? ata_exec_internal_sg+0x8c/0x4dc
> [<ffffffff812643c0>] ata_exec_internal_sg+0x27e/0x4dc
> [<ffffffff81395bb6>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x48/0x58
> [<ffffffff812646ab>] ata_exec_internal+0x8d/0x9c
> [<ffffffff81393b89>] ? wait_for_common+0xcc/0x110
> [<ffffffff8126adb6>] atapi_eh_request_sense+0x9f/0xa8
> [<ffffffff8126dad8>] ata_eh_recover+0x92d/0xbbe
> [<ffffffff8106f4e5>] ? mark_lock+0x28/0x37f
> [<ffffffff812750aa>] ? ahci_postreset+0x0/0x5f
> [<ffffffff8127467f>] ? ahci_hardreset+0x0/0xeb
> [<ffffffff812765fe>] ? ahci_softreset+0x0/0x42
> [<ffffffff81263052>] ? ata_std_prereset+0x0/0xb7
> [<ffffffff81271e7b>] sata_pmp_error_handler+0xd3/0xa0a
> [<ffffffff8101781b>] ? native_sched_clock+0x2d/0x5a
> [<ffffffff8101781b>] ? native_sched_clock+0x2d/0x5a
> [<ffffffff810170b5>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0xc
> [<ffffffff8106e001>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x2c/0x11d
> [<ffffffff81395bb6>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x48/0x58
> [<ffffffff812750a6>] ahci_error_handler+0x4a/0x4e
> [<ffffffff8126e7a8>] ata_scsi_error+0x2c0/0x619
> [<ffffffff8124d189>] scsi_error_handler+0xdd/0x4fe
> [<ffffffff81395bb6>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x48/0x58
> [<ffffffff8106fa96>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x12f/0x153
> [<ffffffff8106fac7>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
> [<ffffffff8124d0ac>] ? scsi_error_handler+0x0/0x4fe
> [<ffffffff81060881>] kthread+0x4d/0x78
> [<ffffffff810126aa>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
> [<ffffffff8100f88b>] ? __switch_to+0x190/0x398
> [<ffffffff81011fbe>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
> [<ffffffff81060834>] ? kthread+0x0/0x78
> [<ffffffff810126a0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
> ---[ end trace 88a6b0f8de8d369d ]---
>
> AFAICT it's complaining about ata_exec_internal(),
> which puts 'sg' on the stack, assigns 'psg' the
> address of 'sg' and passes that pointer to lower
> level code:
>
> unsigned ata_exec_internal(struct ata_device *dev,
> struct ata_taskfile *tf, const u8 *cdb,
> int dma_dir, void *buf, unsigned int buflen,
> unsigned long timeout)
> {
> struct scatterlist *psg = NULL, sg;
> unsigned int n_elem = 0;
>
> if (dma_dir != DMA_NONE) {
> WARN_ON(!buf);
> sg_init_one(&sg, buf, buflen);
> psg = &sg;
> n_elem++;
> }
>
> return ata_exec_internal_sg(dev, tf, cdb, dma_dir, psg, n_elem,
> timeout);
> }
I don't think that's it, we're not DMAing from that pointer.. It seems
more likely that the sense buffer (which is where the data is being put)
somehow resides on the stack. One could print out where buf points in
this function and see if that is the case. Sense buffer gets allocated
by the SCSI layer..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-28 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-27 23:42 ahci 0000:00:1f.2: DMA-API: device driver maps memory from stack Chuck Ebbert
2009-02-28 2:38 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2009-02-28 3:50 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-02-28 5:21 ` Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49A8A3BB.9070903@gmail.com \
--to=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).