linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	stable@kernel.org, josephjang@gmail.com, mrsohn@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes, -stable] ata_piix: add workaround for Samsung DB-P70
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:52:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49AEA3AD.1080309@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49ADE934.6080105@kernel.org>

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Mark.
> 
> Mark Lord wrote:
>> A suggestion, then.  As a follow-up patch, would it be possible
>> to drop the workaround kludge, and restore the missing SCR access,
>> __after the first time that a drive is detected on that port__?
> 
> Hmmm... yeah.  Maybe but it would either involve changing ap->ops on
> the fly (which is a big no no) or wrap SCR access such that it returns
> -EOPNOTSUPP if the kludge is in effect.
> 
>> This way, there won't be any funny business for cases where
>> the same ID might occur on different (non-botched) hardware ?
>>
>> Probably overkill, though.  :)
> 
> Missing SCR access doesn't impact direct usage too much, so yeah I
> think it should be fine as it is until there's some evidence that the
> subsystem IDs are in far wider use.
..

Perfectly sensible!

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-04 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-03  4:52 [PATCH #upstream-fixes, -stable] ata_piix: add workaround for Samsung DB-P70 Tejun Heo
2009-03-03 13:17 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-04  2:36   ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-04 15:52     ` Mark Lord [this message]
2009-03-13 18:58 ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49AEA3AD.1080309@rtr.ca \
    --to=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=josephjang@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mrsohn@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).