From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Cc: Stuart MENEFY <stuart.menefy@st.com>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: Keep shadow last_ctl up to date during resets
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:11:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49B7B87A.1020107@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49B7AE6E.4010704@rtr.ca>
Mark Lord wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Stuart MENEFY wrote:
>>> libata keeps a shadow copy of the ATA CTL register (which is write
>>> only),
>>> and only writes to the hardware when the required value doesn't match
>>> the shadow. However this copy wasn't being maintained when performing
>>> reset functions. This could cause problems for the first operation after
>>> a reset when the correct value might not be written to the CTL register.
>>>
>>> This problem was observed when hotplugging a drive: the identify command
>>> was being issued with interrupts enabled, when they should have been
>>> disabled.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stuart Menefy <stuart.menefy@st.com>
>>
>> Nice catch. Maybe a nice addition would be a ata_sff_write_to_ctl()
>> or something which always does the right thing.
>>
>> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> ..
>
> Mmm.. I wonder if this is severe enough to warrant backporting
> to -stable for the past couple of releases?
Yeah, I think it can be responsible for at least some of runaway IRQs
during detection on ata_piix and is likely to be a good candidate for
-stable but I think it would be better to see how it does on -rc first
for a while before pushing this -stable. sata_nv breakages very well
showed how messed up things can get with obvious fixes. :-)
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-11 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-10 11:38 [PATCH] libata: Keep shadow last_ctl up to date during resets Stuart MENEFY
2009-03-11 7:42 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-11 12:28 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-11 13:11 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-03-13 18:58 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49B7B87A.1020107@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stuart.menefy@st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).