From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/73] pata_efar: use ata.h mode mask defines Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:10:31 -0400 Message-ID: <49BC2B57.9030206@garzik.org> References: <20090314194522.2e8bbaa1@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <49BC1643.9020201@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:53504 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755132AbZCNWKu (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:10:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49BC1643.9020201@ru.mvista.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: =?UTF-8?B?RXJpayBJbmdlIEJvbHPDuA==?= , Alan Cox , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. >=20 > Erik Inge Bols=C3=B8 wrote: >=20 >>>> No functional changes in this patch. >>>> (Looks like it could use one, though.) >>>> =20 >>> Yep - wrong comment. The EFAR is a sort of clone of the PIIX and I=20 >>> copied >>> the comment while EFAR don't appear to have copied the limitation >>> =20 >> >> Most suspicious thing I noted here was 0x0F =3D UDMA3, though. You=20 >> probably meant UDMA4? >> >> Will send bugfix patches after I redo the pure conversion in two=20 >> patches, like Jeff says. >> =20 >=20 > It makes more sense to put the fixes *before* the cleanups. Quite true... Jeff