From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-core More robust parsing for multi_count(v5)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:33:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C2D642.90706@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49C281A5.5080404@rtr.ca>
Hello, Mark.
Mark Lord wrote:
> Make libata more robust when parsing the multi_count
> field from a drive's identify data. This prevents us from
> attempting to use dubious multi_count values ad infinitum.
>
> Reset dev->multi_count to zero and reprobe it each time
> through this routine, as it can change on device reset.
>
> Also ensure that the reported "maximum" value is valid
> and is a power of two, and that the reported "count" value
> is valid and also a power of two. And that the "count"
> value is not greater than the "maximum" value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
The patch looks safe to me although requiring power_of_2 on max seems
a bit too strict. For configuration, ata_dev_configure() is the right
place. I think the following should work.
* add dev->multi_limit which is initialized to -1 on ata_dev_init().
* during ata_dev_configure() if multi_limit < 0, set it to device max.
* set dev->multi to rounddown_pow_of_two(multi_limit) and issue
SET_MULTI.
On EH side, ata_eh_speed_down() is the place to handle it. It can
probably piggy back on ATA_EH_SPDN_SPEED_DOWN block. All it has to do
is reducing dev->multi_limit. dev_config will run later and apply it.
I'm not sure how the speed down strategy should exactly be tho. It is
distinguisible from regular transfer errors?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-19 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-18 14:26 [PATCH] libata-core Use more robust parsing for multi_count Mark Lord
2009-03-18 14:32 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-18 15:06 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-18 15:13 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-18 17:09 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-18 15:58 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH] libata-core More robust parsing for multi_count(v3) Mark Lord
2009-03-18 16:24 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-19 0:23 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-19 0:25 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-19 17:30 ` [PATCH] libata-core More robust parsing for multi_count(v4) Mark Lord
2009-03-19 17:32 ` [PATCH] libata-core More robust parsing for multi_count(v5) Mark Lord
2009-03-19 23:33 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-03-20 3:37 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-20 13:13 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-20 13:14 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-20 14:07 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-20 15:36 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-20 23:14 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-21 0:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-03-21 2:17 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-21 13:54 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-21 14:02 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-21 14:59 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-20 13:38 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-12 15:10 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-12 15:18 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-12 15:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-03-25 2:40 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49C2D642.90706@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).