linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-core More robust parsing for multi_count(v5)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:37:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C30F7B.30800@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49C2D642.90706@kernel.org>

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Mark.
> 
> Mark Lord wrote:
>> Make libata more robust when parsing the multi_count
>> field from a drive's identify data.  This prevents us from
>> attempting to use dubious multi_count values ad infinitum.
>>
>> Reset dev->multi_count to zero and reprobe it each time
>> through this routine, as it can change on device reset.
>>
>> Also ensure that the reported "maximum" value is valid
>> and is a power of two, and that the reported "count" value
>> is valid and also a power of two.  And that the "count"
>> value is not greater than the "maximum" value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> 
> The patch looks safe to me although requiring power_of_2 on max seems
> a bit too strict.
..

Just a safeguard against bad IDENTIFY data.
I've never seen a drive that specified anything there
other than 1, 8, or 16,  and the ATA spec specifically
recommends against using settings that are not powers of 2.

> For configuration, ata_dev_configure() is the right
> place.  I think the following should work.
> 
> * add dev->multi_limit which is initialized to -1 on ata_dev_init().
> 
> * during ata_dev_configure() if multi_limit < 0, set it to device max.
> 
> * set dev->multi to rounddown_pow_of_two(multi_limit) and issue
>   SET_MULTI.
> 
> On EH side, ata_eh_speed_down() is the place to handle it.  It can
> probably piggy back on ATA_EH_SPDN_SPEED_DOWN block.  All it has to do
> is reducing dev->multi_limit.  dev_config will run later and apply it.
..

I won't have time to pursue this in the near/foreseeable future,
so if you feel the urge.. please do it.  Otherwise I might get to
it in a few months from now.

> I'm not sure how the speed down strategy should exactly be tho.  It is
> distinguisible from regular transfer errors?
..

I don't really have a recommendation there, other than to simply stop
using multi_count if there are repeated PIO errors.  Seems like a reasonable
strategy, when all else is failing.

We really need to add SET_MULTIPLE smarts to libata at some point.

Cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-20  3:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-18 14:26 [PATCH] libata-core Use more robust parsing for multi_count Mark Lord
2009-03-18 14:32 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-18 15:06   ` Mark Lord
2009-03-18 15:13     ` Mark Lord
2009-03-18 17:09     ` Alan Cox
2009-03-18 15:58 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-18 16:18   ` [PATCH] libata-core More robust parsing for multi_count(v3) Mark Lord
2009-03-18 16:24     ` Mark Lord
2009-03-19  0:23     ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-19  0:25       ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-19 17:30         ` [PATCH] libata-core More robust parsing for multi_count(v4) Mark Lord
2009-03-19 17:32           ` [PATCH] libata-core More robust parsing for multi_count(v5) Mark Lord
2009-03-19 23:33             ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-20  3:37               ` Mark Lord [this message]
2009-03-20 13:13               ` Mark Lord
2009-03-20 13:14                 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-20 14:07                   ` Alan Cox
2009-03-20 15:36                     ` Mark Lord
2009-03-20 23:14                       ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-21  0:54                         ` Jeff Garzik
2009-03-21  2:17                           ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-21 13:54                             ` Mark Lord
2009-03-21 14:02                           ` Alan Cox
2009-03-21 14:59                             ` Mark Lord
2009-03-20 13:38                 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-12 15:10                 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-12 15:18                   ` Alan Cox
2009-04-12 15:31                     ` Jeff Garzik
2009-03-25  2:40             ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49C30F7B.30800@rtr.ca \
    --to=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).