From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-core More robust parsing for multi_count(v5)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:36:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C3B7E9.2000505@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090320140714.2e7770d0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Alan Cox wrote:
>> Oh, and zero means "don't care". So it's really easy to add
>> to libata without having to patch each and every driver.
>
> If its only one driver why not do it the way we do things like transfer
> length limits for LBA48 (see pata_it821x and others)
..
Thanks. I'll do that, and probably go that way for the sata_mv limit.
The bigger issue here is that libata really doesn't support multiple mode.
Sure, it will blindly use it if the drive appears to be already configured
for it at startup. But I don't see any where that we issue "SET MULTIPLE"
commands or otherwise support turning it on/off or tuning it.
I wonder if we even snoop the SET MULTIPLE command from SG_IO / ATA_{12,16}?
This is more of an infrastructure thing than a driver-specific setting,
so I'm hoping that one of you three (who know the code a lot better
than I do) might think about that for the future.
Thanks again.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-20 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-18 14:26 [PATCH] libata-core Use more robust parsing for multi_count Mark Lord
2009-03-18 14:32 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-18 15:06 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-18 15:13 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-18 17:09 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-18 15:58 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-18 16:18 ` [PATCH] libata-core More robust parsing for multi_count(v3) Mark Lord
2009-03-18 16:24 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-19 0:23 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-19 0:25 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-19 17:30 ` [PATCH] libata-core More robust parsing for multi_count(v4) Mark Lord
2009-03-19 17:32 ` [PATCH] libata-core More robust parsing for multi_count(v5) Mark Lord
2009-03-19 23:33 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-20 3:37 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-20 13:13 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-20 13:14 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-20 14:07 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-20 15:36 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2009-03-20 23:14 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-21 0:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-03-21 2:17 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-21 13:54 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-21 14:02 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-21 14:59 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-20 13:38 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-12 15:10 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-12 15:18 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-12 15:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-03-25 2:40 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49C3B7E9.2000505@rtr.ca \
--to=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).