From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Cc: bzolnier@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] block: implement blk_rq_map_kern_prealloc()
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:10:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49CAE425.5050009@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49CA4B4B.50408@panasas.com>
Hello,
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> I have a similar, totally unrelated patch queued, perhaps we can unify
> the efforts, to satisfy both our needs in one stone.
>
> I've sent this patch:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg34082.html
>
> In an effort to un-export blk_rq_append_bio().
>
> Perhaps you could reorder the code below a bit?
>
> My proposal is:
> * blk_rq_map_kern_prealloc => is simplified to be
> int blk_rq_map_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
> struct bio *bio);
>
> * The extra checks currently inside blk_rq_map_kern_prealloc are moved
> to bio_map_kern_prealloc()
>
> * Users call bio_map_kern_prealloc() directly and then use blk_rq_map_bio()
> in a two stage process.
>
> So blk_rq_map_bio becomes a BLOCK_PC command's way of a
> pre-allocated bio the way FS_PC commands use generic_make_request.
Sounds good. I'll make the change.
> Thanks for doing all this. BTW' how close are we to remove req->data
> and req->buffer
Those patches will be going out later today. It will also kill
rq->hard_* and rq->*nr_sectors. Single byte-granual data length for
all along with single way to carray data via bio! :-)
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-26 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-24 16:06 [PATCHSET pata-2.6] ide: rq->buffer, data, special and misc cleanups Tejun Heo
2009-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 01/14] block: clear req->errors on bio completion only for fs requests Tejun Heo
2009-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 02/14] block: reorganize [__]bio_map_kern() Tejun Heo
2009-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 03/14] block: implement blk_rq_map_kern_prealloc() Tejun Heo
2009-03-25 15:18 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-03-26 2:10 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-03-26 7:42 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-26 8:05 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-03-26 8:10 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-03-26 10:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-26 11:23 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-03-26 12:07 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-26 14:44 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-03-27 2:26 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-13 10:07 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 04/14] ide: use blk_run_queue() instead of blk_start_queueing() Tejun Heo
2009-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 05/14] ide: don't set REQ_SOFTBARRIER Tejun Heo
2009-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 06/14] ide kill unused ide_cmd->special Tejun Heo
2009-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 07/14] ide-cd: clear sense buffer before issuing request sense Tejun Heo
2009-03-26 7:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-03-26 7:26 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 08/14] ide-floppy: block pc always uses bio Tejun Heo
2009-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 09/14] ide-taskfile: don't abuse rq->buffer Tejun Heo
2009-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 10/14] ide-atapi: " Tejun Heo
2009-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 11/14] ide-cd: " Tejun Heo
2009-03-26 8:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 12/14] ide-pm: don't abuse rq->data Tejun Heo
2009-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 13/14] ide-atapi: use bio for request sense Tejun Heo
2009-03-28 8:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-03-24 16:06 ` [PATCH 14/14] ide-cd: " Tejun Heo
2009-04-13 8:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-03-28 13:51 ` [PATCHSET pata-2.6] ide: rq->buffer, data, special and misc cleanups Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-28 14:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-03-30 9:12 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-30 11:14 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-03-30 17:20 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-31 8:43 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-03-31 9:05 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-31 9:10 ` Tejun Heo
2009-03-31 13:04 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-03-31 13:43 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-01 11:50 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-04-13 7:41 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-13 7:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-13 8:22 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-13 8:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-13 10:07 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-04-13 14:16 ` James Bottomley
2009-03-30 14:50 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-30 17:21 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49CAE425.5050009@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).